From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac ( talk · contribs) 06:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply


Reviewing later.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 06:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply

That should be it.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 04:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply

@ CycloneIsaac and Yellow Evan: There is more work that needs to be done for this article before it meets GA criteria, namely with the prose. I'll provide further corrections that need to be made tomorrow. ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 06:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Yea, I did a quick readthrough and I'm like what was I thinking when I wrote this. I made some short-term changes. Y E Pacific Hurricane 07:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments from JC

Since Cyclonebiskit is having computer trouble, I'll offer some of my own suggestions for improvements. Not sure how far or in-depth I'll get yet, but I'll start from the beginning and add comments as I go along...

These are the blatant errors and ambiguities I found on an initial read-through. There are plenty of other instances of clumsy wording where nothing is technically wrong, but improvements would still be beneficial. – Juliancolton |  Talk 02:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for talking an honest and non-half-assed look at this. Greatly appreciated. Y E Pacific Hurricane 05:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac ( talk · contribs) 06:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply


Reviewing later.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 06:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC) reply

That should be it.— CycloneIsaac ( Talk) 04:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply

@ CycloneIsaac and Yellow Evan: There is more work that needs to be done for this article before it meets GA criteria, namely with the prose. I'll provide further corrections that need to be made tomorrow. ~ Cyclonebiskit ( chat) 06:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply
Yea, I did a quick readthrough and I'm like what was I thinking when I wrote this. I made some short-term changes. Y E Pacific Hurricane 07:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Comments from JC

Since Cyclonebiskit is having computer trouble, I'll offer some of my own suggestions for improvements. Not sure how far or in-depth I'll get yet, but I'll start from the beginning and add comments as I go along...

These are the blatant errors and ambiguities I found on an initial read-through. There are plenty of other instances of clumsy wording where nothing is technically wrong, but improvements would still be beneficial. – Juliancolton |  Talk 02:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Thanks for talking an honest and non-half-assed look at this. Greatly appreciated. Y E Pacific Hurricane 05:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook