![]() | Typhoon Faith has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 29, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
With the issues below addressed, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as structure and general layout.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The article has plenty of reliable sources that it makes good use of. No signs of original research.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Based on my past experience with articles on subjects of this nature, the article satisfactorily covers all basic aspects of its topic.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic, throughout.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Since its creation, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similar disruptive behaviours.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Both images used in the article are public domain, and serve relevant illustrative purposes.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm happy to say that this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | Typhoon Faith has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: January 29, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 06:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
With the issues below addressed, the article complies with MOS policies on grammar, as well as structure and general layout.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The article has plenty of reliable sources that it makes good use of. No signs of original research.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:14, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Based on my past experience with articles on subjects of this nature, the article satisfactorily covers all basic aspects of its topic.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:13, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic, throughout.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
07:12, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Since its creation, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similar disruptive behaviours.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Both images used in the article are public domain, and serve relevant illustrative purposes.
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
06:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
I'm happy to say that this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations!
Says the 21st century, "I'm 18 and I like it!" (
talk)
08:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)