This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anatomy: Gross Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to gross anatomy.

It is needlessly complex to have these eight different articles on the tympanic cavity when one higher-quality article would suffice. This is needlessly fragmented and a detriment to readers, as well as impacting on the quality of all eight articles, by impacting on their editing and removing contextual information. I propose a merge between these articles. LT910001 ( talk) 08:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)  Done reply

As for reasons above.

Oppose: I find the current structure easy to navigate and understand. The tympanic cavity articles gives a summary, with the smaller articles (like Promontory of tympanic cavity) giving more detail, a very conventional structure on Wikipedia. Klbrain ( talk) 22:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Hello Klbrain I don't know if you knew that the walls had already been merged. The proposal on page for merge with promontory has not been tagged here so shall enter it now. -- Iztwoz ( talk) 22:16, 3 February 2017 (UTC) reply