This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Ty Erickson appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 May 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Profiles:
Personal:
Horses:
2011Season
2012Season
2014NFR
2014Season
2015NFR
2016Season
2016NFR
2017Season:
2017NFR:
2018Season:
Videos:
dawnleelynn (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Added additional sources today. I have to sort through some of the 2017 NFR sources to figure out which ones are relevant and add more later, like the NFR YouTube Round Highlight videos, the roound results articles, the NFR Insider articles, the NFR Photos posted each day of rounds, etc. dawnleelynn (talk) 23:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Added three new personal web sites on the Ericksons.
I went through my bookmarks folder "2017NFR" and sorted them all out into subfolders so I could find the ones relevant to Erickson. I've now added them here to these sources, added all of the ten round results, two of the Las Vegas Journal-Review Photos articles, and two of the NFR Insider articles. I didn't find any of Erickson in the YouTube video highlights from each round. dawnleelynn (talk) 18:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Anomalocaris Hi, I noticed you made some edits in good faith to one of my User pages, type UserDraft. I appreciate your intention but editors I don't know don't normally edit my userdrafts unless it's for violations such as having non-free content in them or active categories, for example, according to policy. The way the categories were authored was my poor attempt to make them inactive. I have since changed them to have no code around them so this issue should be moot now. If you could follow the policies in WP:NOBAN and WP:USERTALKBLOG regarding respecting my userspace and not edit my pages unless there is a violation or substantial contribution, I would appreciate it. In the case of those two circumstances, I would also appreciate if you could address them on my talk page first as also suggested in the policy. Also, regarding the citation changes, please see WP:CITEVAR regarding changing citation styles. But, I will ask my mentor about the newspaper citation style. I have used it in certain situations, but not all the time. She has over 12 years experience like you, and she is watching over this article. Thank you for your help. dawnleelynn (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
dawnleelynn: I'm not going to mess further with your <ref> styles, but I thought I'd go to The Open Wikipedia Ranking and see what the most viewed articles have regarding listing newspaper names and websites. Results follow:
This survey of (allegedly) the 10 most-viewed "human" pages of 2016 shows that all 10 reference newspaper sources with the newspaper names without a form of the website, that is, The New York Times without www.nytimes.com. Also, 9 of 10 use
Anomalocaris Thanks for your explanation again. But maybe you aren't hearing me? I tried it again in the latest source, but it's still not working for me. I did it just like in the article you linked Filmhub. But only the first category doesn't link-it appears as a redlink, the rest of them link to categories. It's the exact same way I tried to do it in the that history version I linked earlier where that doesn't work right either. I put the colon in, but they still link to categories anyway. All but the first one link to categories. There is something weird going on. Take a look at the article for yourself, you'll see exactly what I mean. Obviously, I am not doing something right. I need these to not link. Or will simply remove the code around the categories again. Thanks. dawnleelynn (talk) 02:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
07:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Created by Dawnleelynn ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
This is my first DYK review. I think your article is ok.
Jirangmoon (
talk)
10:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Ty Erickson appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 May 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Profiles:
Personal:
Horses:
2011Season
2012Season
2014NFR
2014Season
2015NFR
2016Season
2016NFR
2017Season:
2017NFR:
2018Season:
Videos:
dawnleelynn (talk) 03:32, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Added additional sources today. I have to sort through some of the 2017 NFR sources to figure out which ones are relevant and add more later, like the NFR YouTube Round Highlight videos, the roound results articles, the NFR Insider articles, the NFR Photos posted each day of rounds, etc. dawnleelynn (talk) 23:02, 16 April 2018 (UTC) Added three new personal web sites on the Ericksons.
I went through my bookmarks folder "2017NFR" and sorted them all out into subfolders so I could find the ones relevant to Erickson. I've now added them here to these sources, added all of the ten round results, two of the Las Vegas Journal-Review Photos articles, and two of the NFR Insider articles. I didn't find any of Erickson in the YouTube video highlights from each round. dawnleelynn (talk) 18:41, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Extended content
|
---|
Anomalocaris Hi, I noticed you made some edits in good faith to one of my User pages, type UserDraft. I appreciate your intention but editors I don't know don't normally edit my userdrafts unless it's for violations such as having non-free content in them or active categories, for example, according to policy. The way the categories were authored was my poor attempt to make them inactive. I have since changed them to have no code around them so this issue should be moot now. If you could follow the policies in WP:NOBAN and WP:USERTALKBLOG regarding respecting my userspace and not edit my pages unless there is a violation or substantial contribution, I would appreciate it. In the case of those two circumstances, I would also appreciate if you could address them on my talk page first as also suggested in the policy. Also, regarding the citation changes, please see WP:CITEVAR regarding changing citation styles. But, I will ask my mentor about the newspaper citation style. I have used it in certain situations, but not all the time. She has over 12 years experience like you, and she is watching over this article. Thank you for your help. dawnleelynn (talk) 17:32, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
dawnleelynn: I'm not going to mess further with your <ref> styles, but I thought I'd go to The Open Wikipedia Ranking and see what the most viewed articles have regarding listing newspaper names and websites. Results follow:
This survey of (allegedly) the 10 most-viewed "human" pages of 2016 shows that all 10 reference newspaper sources with the newspaper names without a form of the website, that is, The New York Times without www.nytimes.com. Also, 9 of 10 use
Anomalocaris Thanks for your explanation again. But maybe you aren't hearing me? I tried it again in the latest source, but it's still not working for me. I did it just like in the article you linked Filmhub. But only the first category doesn't link-it appears as a redlink, the rest of them link to categories. It's the exact same way I tried to do it in the that history version I linked earlier where that doesn't work right either. I put the colon in, but they still link to categories anyway. All but the first one link to categories. There is something weird going on. Take a look at the article for yourself, you'll see exactly what I mean. Obviously, I am not doing something right. I need these to not link. Or will simply remove the code around the categories again. Thanks. dawnleelynn (talk) 02:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
07:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Created by Dawnleelynn ( talk). Self-nominated at 22:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
This is my first DYK review. I think your article is ok.
Jirangmoon (
talk)
10:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)