![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
According to the title of this article (as well as the note at the start), the difference between this article and British two pound coin is that the former describes pre-decimal coins and the latter post-decimal. This does not seem to be true. This article seems to cover the continuation of the gold £2 coin issues right through decimalisation and beyond. So, the distinction seems to be one of coin series rather than decimalisation per se. 86.133.243.5 ( talk) 01:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC).
Reverted a paragraph here.
While it may be technically true (I assume) that the current £2 is issued in proof condition, it seems clear that the original paragraph referred to the historical (pre-1997) coins. Otherwise, why would it say "although the issues of 1823, 1887, 1893, and 1902 did circulate" unless it was to be assumed that the coin did not otherwise circulate?
Since the present coin *is* in circulation, and since it isn't the subject of the article, the changed version doesn't make sense, and it can be assumed that this wasn't the original intent. Ubcule ( talk) 15:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
According to the title of this article (as well as the note at the start), the difference between this article and British two pound coin is that the former describes pre-decimal coins and the latter post-decimal. This does not seem to be true. This article seems to cover the continuation of the gold £2 coin issues right through decimalisation and beyond. So, the distinction seems to be one of coin series rather than decimalisation per se. 86.133.243.5 ( talk) 01:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC).
Reverted a paragraph here.
While it may be technically true (I assume) that the current £2 is issued in proof condition, it seems clear that the original paragraph referred to the historical (pre-1997) coins. Otherwise, why would it say "although the issues of 1823, 1887, 1893, and 1902 did circulate" unless it was to be assumed that the coin did not otherwise circulate?
Since the present coin *is* in circulation, and since it isn't the subject of the article, the changed version doesn't make sense, and it can be assumed that this wasn't the original intent. Ubcule ( talk) 15:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)