This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Devon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Somerset Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Perhaps I don't understand the use of stubs, but it seems that by adding both the Devon stub and the UK stub, more people will be inclined to review the article—which seems like a good thing. Is there some etiquette or style reason why a page can't have both? Ryan McDaniel 16:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Two Moors Way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106044450/http://www.bedandbreakfastdevon.org/community/two-moors-way.shtml to http://www.bedandbreakfastdevon.org/community/two-moors-way.shtml
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071101015448/http://www.devon.gov.uk/index/transport/public_rights_of_way/where_to_walk_and_ride/two_moors_way.htm to http://www.devon.gov.uk/index/transport/public_rights_of_way/where_to_walk_and_ride/two_moors_way.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 19:08, 12 May 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi I have just become aware that the Joe Turner passed away in 2002 and not 2004. If you Google search this all results will tell you that it is 2004 and this includes currently the offical Two Moors Way guide. I have had correspondence with a lot of key people involved included the two Moors Way Committee and they confirm this is a mistake. I have a copy of the Two Moors Way official guide that repeats the error. The fact remains that Devon County Council errected the memorial to Joe Turner in 2003 (see my photo on link below). It is not possible that he died in 2004. Those that knew him confirm he died in 2002 and the 2004 date is a mistake.

I have just written a description of this on my own website

Prehistoric Dartmoor Walks - Joe Turner DartmoorDave ( talk) 21:40, 23 July 2024 (UTC) reply

This is a photo of the memorial plaque dated 2003:

— Preceding unsigned comment added by DartmoorDave ( talk • contribs) 15:57, 24 July 2024 (UTC) reply