The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article does not meet the
GA criteria. The original review was shoddy in the first place. This article is not only skinny, but it is not fully sourced (breaks #2,
2 Hearts#Release history,
2 Hearts#Track listings,
2 Hearts#Live performances,
2 Hearts#Background and release).
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
00:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist — As the nominator said, the article's content is quite small, which doesn't really have to be much of a problem, but there's a lot of unsourced information. ℥ nding· start 19:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist - Definitely not up to standards. Candy o32 00:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist – Not on par to be a GA in no way, not even a B-class article. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist
Pixelyoshi (
discuter)
16:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- You need to write why...
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
23:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Not fully sourced and quite small Pixelyoshi ( discuter) 17:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- You need to write why...
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
23:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This article does not meet the
GA criteria. The original review was shoddy in the first place. This article is not only skinny, but it is not fully sourced (breaks #2,
2 Hearts#Release history,
2 Hearts#Track listings,
2 Hearts#Live performances,
2 Hearts#Background and release).
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
00:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist — As the nominator said, the article's content is quite small, which doesn't really have to be much of a problem, but there's a lot of unsourced information. ℥ nding· start 19:12, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist - Definitely not up to standards. Candy o32 00:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist – Not on par to be a GA in no way, not even a B-class article. — Legolas (talk2me) 15:49, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support delist
Pixelyoshi (
discuter)
16:06, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- You need to write why...
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
23:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- Not fully sourced and quite small Pixelyoshi ( discuter) 17:23, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- You need to write why...
I Help, When I Can.
[12]
23:14, 1 May 2011 (UTC)