![]() | Two Fathers (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Two Fathers (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 6) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cassandra never says that the Samantha Mulder met was a clone, she simply says the woman Mulder met was not Samantha. A minor technicality, yes, but I think we should keep the plot summary as accurate as possible. That series of lines has always bugged the hell out of me because all the adult Samantha clones were killed off in End Game, I don't see how Cassandra even knew about that meeting and I've always felt that best resolution was that it was the real Samantha. Ah well. Not to mention that her line contradicts the episode Closure, although Closure contradicts pretty much every single mythology episode in the series. -_- In any case, regardless off all that, I'd be more comfortable if we simply said what Cassandra actually said in the episode, that she wasn't the real Samantha, and nothing more.
Regardless of how we word the last line of the intro, we should have some sort of reference, what would be best would obviously be some lines for the reception section that discuss how the episode was viewed. Someone's gonna tag it or delete it as OR at some point if we don't have some sort of reference there. I think the best would be a mixture of the old and new language; my experiences and personal opinions anyway are that the two episodes are great, but killing off the Syndicate was a huge mistake that left the mythology rather directionless going forward. Will be gone for a few days, but can revisit this upon my return later during the weekend. Quiddity99 ( talk) 13:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Quiddity
That "negatively" word, was a mistake by me, changed it to "positvely". I forget stuff during the editing.-- TIAYN ( talk) 14:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I will review this article. -- Edge3 ( talk) 01:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Done "This episode and its follow up, "One Son" earned the show's crew the Emmy for "Outstanding Makeup for a Series". The make-up crew was nominated for an Emmy award in the category "Outstanding Makeup for a Series" and won." The two sentences are redundant. Remove the second one. --
Edge3 (
talk)
22:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Well done. I'm now passing it as GA. -- Edge3 ( talk) 22:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
![]() | Two Fathers (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Two Fathers (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 6) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cassandra never says that the Samantha Mulder met was a clone, she simply says the woman Mulder met was not Samantha. A minor technicality, yes, but I think we should keep the plot summary as accurate as possible. That series of lines has always bugged the hell out of me because all the adult Samantha clones were killed off in End Game, I don't see how Cassandra even knew about that meeting and I've always felt that best resolution was that it was the real Samantha. Ah well. Not to mention that her line contradicts the episode Closure, although Closure contradicts pretty much every single mythology episode in the series. -_- In any case, regardless off all that, I'd be more comfortable if we simply said what Cassandra actually said in the episode, that she wasn't the real Samantha, and nothing more.
Regardless of how we word the last line of the intro, we should have some sort of reference, what would be best would obviously be some lines for the reception section that discuss how the episode was viewed. Someone's gonna tag it or delete it as OR at some point if we don't have some sort of reference there. I think the best would be a mixture of the old and new language; my experiences and personal opinions anyway are that the two episodes are great, but killing off the Syndicate was a huge mistake that left the mythology rather directionless going forward. Will be gone for a few days, but can revisit this upon my return later during the weekend. Quiddity99 ( talk) 13:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)Quiddity
That "negatively" word, was a mistake by me, changed it to "positvely". I forget stuff during the editing.-- TIAYN ( talk) 14:29, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I will review this article. -- Edge3 ( talk) 01:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Done "This episode and its follow up, "One Son" earned the show's crew the Emmy for "Outstanding Makeup for a Series". The make-up crew was nominated for an Emmy award in the category "Outstanding Makeup for a Series" and won." The two sentences are redundant. Remove the second one. --
Edge3 (
talk)
22:30, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Well done. I'm now passing it as GA. -- Edge3 ( talk) 22:15, 20 October 2009 (UTC)