![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article as it stands reads like a company newsletter ( WP:PROMOTION). Many of the links are to the company's own website and the article was evidently written by someone close to it hence likely WP:COI. asnac ( talk) 06:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
The same issues have arisen again. Edited by numerous single-purpose accounts, again likely WP:COI. Promotional material has been removed per WP:BOLD. asnac ( talk) 17:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
The above edit has since been reverted. I have had an other look at this page and it is overwhelmingly material that is just not relevant - the sort of thing that you would find in a brochure or annual report but not suitable for an encyclopaedia - so lists of content available on its platform, lists of industry awards, lists of partners. I have retained just a couple of things after the lead and first section. I realise the work that has been put into it but it is also clear that it has been done entirely by those with WP:COI. asnac ( talk) 14:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
I've tagged this article as needing cleanup after making a start. The markets should be in the body, not the introduction, and the references on its founding can also be moved to the History section. The work with UNICEF and the BBC is included in a list then given its own separate treatment. I may not have caught all the instances of punctuation after rather than before references. The references also need a good going over. There are slabs of bare links, but those that are identified are in many instances insufficiently identified: lacking date, author, in some cases the specific article title with the publication used instead, and there may still be misspellings of "Guardian" and instances of "twww" for "www".
I also endorse the concern about promotionalism raised above. It would be a good idea to rewrite more concisely and neutrally. Yngvadottir ( talk) 07:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Education Technology (New section)
Twinkl creates resources using recent technologies, particularly Augmented Reality (AR), to support teachers teaching subjects such as history, robotics, physics and coding. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Being based in the North of England, Twinkl is part of a growing tech sector in the UK that is developing outside of London.[5] To support this growth, Twinkl announced the launch of TwinklHive, and EdTech accelerator in September 2019.[6] This accelerator offers support to EdTech startups based in Sheffield.
109.69.235.122 ( talk) 10:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Please open a new edit request when ready to proceed. Regards, Spintendo 02:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Education Technology (New section)
Twinkl creates resources using recent technologies, particularly Augmented Reality (AR), to support teachers teaching subjects such as history, robotics, physics and coding. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Twinkl resources that make use of AR technology include ARchitect, an app-based puzzle game which uses teaches users about physics, and Little Red Coding Club which is a multiplayer game that teaches children to code. [1] [2] Another app, Twinkl Ages: York, teaches users about the history of the city of York through AR models of the city throughout the centuries. [3] Twinkl has also released a series of AR models through Apple Quick Look, including models of human anatomy, animals, plants and planets. [4] Users are able to explore these models, including exploring textures and structures.
109.69.235.122 ( talk) 11:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
.Did you get a change to look at these? 109.69.235.122 ( talk) 12:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article as it stands reads like a company newsletter ( WP:PROMOTION). Many of the links are to the company's own website and the article was evidently written by someone close to it hence likely WP:COI. asnac ( talk) 06:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
The same issues have arisen again. Edited by numerous single-purpose accounts, again likely WP:COI. Promotional material has been removed per WP:BOLD. asnac ( talk) 17:47, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
The above edit has since been reverted. I have had an other look at this page and it is overwhelmingly material that is just not relevant - the sort of thing that you would find in a brochure or annual report but not suitable for an encyclopaedia - so lists of content available on its platform, lists of industry awards, lists of partners. I have retained just a couple of things after the lead and first section. I realise the work that has been put into it but it is also clear that it has been done entirely by those with WP:COI. asnac ( talk) 14:00, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
I've tagged this article as needing cleanup after making a start. The markets should be in the body, not the introduction, and the references on its founding can also be moved to the History section. The work with UNICEF and the BBC is included in a list then given its own separate treatment. I may not have caught all the instances of punctuation after rather than before references. The references also need a good going over. There are slabs of bare links, but those that are identified are in many instances insufficiently identified: lacking date, author, in some cases the specific article title with the publication used instead, and there may still be misspellings of "Guardian" and instances of "twww" for "www".
I also endorse the concern about promotionalism raised above. It would be a good idea to rewrite more concisely and neutrally. Yngvadottir ( talk) 07:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Education Technology (New section)
Twinkl creates resources using recent technologies, particularly Augmented Reality (AR), to support teachers teaching subjects such as history, robotics, physics and coding. [1] [2] [3] [4]
Being based in the North of England, Twinkl is part of a growing tech sector in the UK that is developing outside of London.[5] To support this growth, Twinkl announced the launch of TwinklHive, and EdTech accelerator in September 2019.[6] This accelerator offers support to EdTech startups based in Sheffield.
109.69.235.122 ( talk) 10:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
Please open a new edit request when ready to proceed. Regards, Spintendo 02:57, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Education Technology (New section)
Twinkl creates resources using recent technologies, particularly Augmented Reality (AR), to support teachers teaching subjects such as history, robotics, physics and coding. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Twinkl resources that make use of AR technology include ARchitect, an app-based puzzle game which uses teaches users about physics, and Little Red Coding Club which is a multiplayer game that teaches children to code. [1] [2] Another app, Twinkl Ages: York, teaches users about the history of the city of York through AR models of the city throughout the centuries. [3] Twinkl has also released a series of AR models through Apple Quick Look, including models of human anatomy, animals, plants and planets. [4] Users are able to explore these models, including exploring textures and structures.
109.69.235.122 ( talk) 11:21, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
.Did you get a change to look at these? 109.69.235.122 ( talk) 12:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)