This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: Computer / Web Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Web animation work group (assessed as Low-importance). Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Starting from this point [1] this article has ceased to be objective. It consists almost entirely of promotion with factual basis being edited out in favour of fan material. Frontfacing ( talk) 02:02, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply

You're right; I reverted it. The edit purports to "clarify the facts about the partnership with Motorola", but in fact removes all reference to it (the word "Motorola" no longer even exists in the text of the article). I'll add back whatever material from that edit and later might have been encyclopedic... — flamingspinach | (talk) 05:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC) reply