I read the entire article and I found no significant problems! I've seen this episode and it all seems good. You tend to overuse dashes and the production section seems rather long, but it is written very well overall.
Factually accurate and verifiable
There isn't a significant number of sources, but some are used multiple times and there are no sections without any.
Broad in its coverage
I can't think of anything missing. I did look at the tardis file link and I thought that it had a lot of interesting specific information, but not all of it is appropriate here. I do fear, though, that the casual reader would care more about plot details than writing and reception.
Neutral
Yes
Stable
Yes
Images
Looks good. More than one is always nice, but there's that darn fair use!
I read the entire article and I found no significant problems! I've seen this episode and it all seems good. You tend to overuse dashes and the production section seems rather long, but it is written very well overall.
Factually accurate and verifiable
There isn't a significant number of sources, but some are used multiple times and there are no sections without any.
Broad in its coverage
I can't think of anything missing. I did look at the tardis file link and I thought that it had a lot of interesting specific information, but not all of it is appropriate here. I do fear, though, that the casual reader would care more about plot details than writing and reception.
Neutral
Yes
Stable
Yes
Images
Looks good. More than one is always nice, but there's that darn fair use!