This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Be aware of the royal ark
There is no doubt that the one who made this site http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Tonga, Christopher Buyers, has done a lot of work on it. But it seems that the quality is inversily proportional to the size. Many names and places are utterly miss spelled. Several, especially older, pre-European data seem to be consisting of largely wishfull thinking, contradicted by most historians who really have investigated these periods. I would not recommend that Wikipedians take it as their only source. -- Tauʻolunga 08:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Be aware of the royal ark
There is no doubt that the one who made this site http://www.4dw.net/royalark/Tonga, Christopher Buyers, has done a lot of work on it. But it seems that the quality is inversily proportional to the size. Many names and places are utterly miss spelled. Several, especially older, pre-European data seem to be consisting of largely wishfull thinking, contradicted by most historians who really have investigated these periods. I would not recommend that Wikipedians take it as their only source. -- Tauʻolunga 08:09, 13 May 2006 (UTC)