This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tupolev Tu-85 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tupolev Tu-85 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on June 20, 2009. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thurgate ( talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1. Link for DoD.
2. Link for Shvetsov design
3. Do the aspect ratio numbers need any conversion templates?
4. Change ventral to central
5. Suggest a link for dorsal
6. 85/2 was incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft. Suggest - 85/2 incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft,
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate ( talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Passed. Thurgate ( talk) 00:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tupolev Tu-85 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Tupolev Tu-85 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on June 20, 2009. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Thurgate ( talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
1. Link for DoD.
2. Link for Shvetsov design
3. Do the aspect ratio numbers need any conversion templates?
4. Change ventral to central
5. Suggest a link for dorsal
6. 85/2 was incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft. Suggest - 85/2 incorporated the lessons learned from the first aircraft,
I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate ( talk) 01:46, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Passed. Thurgate ( talk) 00:34, 22 February 2011 (UTC)