![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Tully Lough Cross appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 April 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
21:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Created by Ceoil ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you for a fascinating article. I'm so glad that the authorities were able to rescue the artefact.
When that is done, this nom should be good to go.
Just one suggestion, which does not affect the nomination. It is usually unwise to fix the size of an article image, bearing in mind that many editors have chosen a particular image-size in their preferences, to fit their devices - but that choice only works for them on thumbnails. So I would suggest reverting your infobox image to a thumbnail. But that is up to you.
Note: I have copyedited the article, because there were so many ce issues that it would have taken too long to explain them all to you. (That copyedit does not affect the nom., and it has not affected content.) Storye book ( talk) 13:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P1
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Tully Lough Cross appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 14 April 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk)
21:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
Created by Ceoil ( talk). Self-nominated at 01:58, 12 March 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Thank you for a fascinating article. I'm so glad that the authorities were able to rescue the artefact.
When that is done, this nom should be good to go.
Just one suggestion, which does not affect the nomination. It is usually unwise to fix the size of an article image, bearing in mind that many editors have chosen a particular image-size in their preferences, to fit their devices - but that choice only works for them on thumbnails. So I would suggest reverting your infobox image to a thumbnail. But that is up to you.
Note: I have copyedited the article, because there were so many ce issues that it would have taken too long to explain them all to you. (That copyedit does not affect the nom., and it has not affected content.) Storye book ( talk) 13:13, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Modified ALT0 to T:DYK/P1