This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Tulio de Oliveira appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 20:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Created by Whispyhistory ( talk) and Philafrenzy ( talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory ( talk) at 20:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC).
How about:
Philafrenzy ( talk) 18:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
The sentence "With others he has suggested ... " has several issues:
-- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 15:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
On 2021-01-15, David Cyranoski wrote an article for nature.com, praising Oliveiras efficient work with small budget and his sharing of data with COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium's Andrew Rambaut: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00065-4 . Cyranoski says, the fast communications between Oliveira and Rambaut, especially Oliveira telling Rambaut about N501Y, made it possible to identify the alpha (Kent) variant early. -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 21:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:Philafrenzy, in the article the name is written twice in the spelling "De Oliveirade". These two came into the article by contributions of two different editors. I am not sure: Do You think it was a mistake, or is there a rule in English grammar that says this is correct? (I am a native speaker of German, far from perfect in English language.) Best regards -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 17:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello User:Whispyhistory and User:Philafrenzy and you all! The two sources
name="sun" "News - Renowned bioinformatician joins forces with..." www.sun.ac.za. 20 July 2021. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
and
name="Global"
"Tulio de Oliveira | University of Washington - Department of Global Health". globalhealth.washington.edu. University of Washington.
Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021. {{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
/ |archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 21 December 2021 suggested (
help)
disagree in the question from which university de Oliveira earned/received the bachelor's degree. The user Tuliodna, who probably is indeed Professor de Oliveira, changed it in the intro/lead paragraph to "De Oliveira studied first at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil and then moved to South Africa in 1997 where he completed his bachelor's, master's degree, … ", the bachelor subject was removed from the intro afterwards. Regarding the discrepancy between the sources, this is nearly well-sourced, but "nearly" is not the same as "certainly/positively/actually". The sentence about the bachelor degree in the early life section remained unchanged. How shall we behave? -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 06:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think a Wikipedia article about an academic should have a "Selected Publications" section. The [Notability]( Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)) guidelines don't mention it, and I believe it goes against general Wikipedia philosophy. This is not a CV.
A link to Google Scholar or personal webpage is more appropriate.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
A fact from Tulio de Oliveira appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 17 January 2022 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
The result was: promoted by
Theleekycauldron (
talk) 20:28, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Created by Whispyhistory ( talk) and Philafrenzy ( talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory ( talk) at 20:14, 28 December 2021 (UTC).
How about:
Philafrenzy ( talk) 18:45, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
The sentence "With others he has suggested ... " has several issues:
-- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 15:26, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
On 2021-01-15, David Cyranoski wrote an article for nature.com, praising Oliveiras efficient work with small budget and his sharing of data with COVID-19 Genomics UK Consortium's Andrew Rambaut: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00065-4 . Cyranoski says, the fast communications between Oliveira and Rambaut, especially Oliveira telling Rambaut about N501Y, made it possible to identify the alpha (Kent) variant early. -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 21:41, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Dear User:Philafrenzy, in the article the name is written twice in the spelling "De Oliveirade". These two came into the article by contributions of two different editors. I am not sure: Do You think it was a mistake, or is there a rule in English grammar that says this is correct? (I am a native speaker of German, far from perfect in English language.) Best regards -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 17:14, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello User:Whispyhistory and User:Philafrenzy and you all! The two sources
name="sun" "News - Renowned bioinformatician joins forces with..." www.sun.ac.za. 20 July 2021. Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
and
name="Global"
"Tulio de Oliveira | University of Washington - Department of Global Health". globalhealth.washington.edu. University of Washington.
Archived from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021. {{
cite web}}
: |archive-date=
/ |archive-url=
timestamp mismatch; 21 December 2021 suggested (
help)
disagree in the question from which university de Oliveira earned/received the bachelor's degree. The user Tuliodna, who probably is indeed Professor de Oliveira, changed it in the intro/lead paragraph to "De Oliveira studied first at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul in Brazil and then moved to South Africa in 1997 where he completed his bachelor's, master's degree, … ", the bachelor subject was removed from the intro afterwards. Regarding the discrepancy between the sources, this is nearly well-sourced, but "nearly" is not the same as "certainly/positively/actually". The sentence about the bachelor degree in the early life section remained unchanged. How shall we behave? -- Himbeerbläuling ( talk) 06:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
I don't think a Wikipedia article about an academic should have a "Selected Publications" section. The [Notability]( Wikipedia:Notability_(academics)) guidelines don't mention it, and I believe it goes against general Wikipedia philosophy. This is not a CV.
A link to Google Scholar or personal webpage is more appropriate.