This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains Trains Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Hong Kong: Transport Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Hong Kong Transport workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Hong Kong To-do: history watch purge Attention needed (60) ...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (23) Collaboration needed Recommend topic Improvement needed GA-Class articles (59) • B-Class articles (287) Cleanup needed C-Class articles (1,004) Image needed (346) Destub needed Start-Class articles (5,373) • Stub-Class articles (6,710) Deorphan needed ...orphans Page creation needed Requested articles Miscellaneous tasks ...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (412) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,303)

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

To undo the following disruptive reverts User:Citobun has made:

1. In the last paragraph, from In May 2020, the government invited the MTRCL to proceed with ... to In May 2020, the government invited the MTR to proceed with ... (Undo to reinstate the letters "CL" after "MTR" in order to tie in with the source given near the end of the paragraph and to disambiguate between the MTR (the system) and the MTRCL (the company).)
2. Also in the paragraph, from At that time, approximately 60,000 people lived within a {{convert​|adj=on​|500​|metre}} catchment of Tuen Mun South station, while ... to At that time, approximately 60,000 people lived within a 500-metre catchment of Tuen Mun South station, while ... (Undo to reinstate the {{ convert}} tag.)

Thanks. 42.200.166.13 ( talk) 01:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

 Not done: ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 01:40, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

Thank you, ScottishFinnishRadish. Is there any particular reason why this shouldn't be done? Ymblanter what do you think? Is there any reason why the current version was chosen? 42.200.166.13 ( talk) 15:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

To substitute "... tentatively called " '''A16 station''' "." in the last paragraph with "... tentatively called "⁠{{ill​|A16 station​|yue​|%E5%B1%AF%E9%96%8016%E5%8D%80%E7%AB%99}}".". 42.200.166.13 ( talk) 15:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

 Not done: Edit requests are not for continuing edit wars. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 15:29, 26 November 2021 (UTC) reply

I don't quite understand why it would be relevant to the past content dispute. (But yes Citobun editwars with everything. He simply reverts everything altogether as long as there is a tiny bit he doesn't agree.) 42.200.166.13 ( talk) 12:16, 29 November 2021 (UTC) reply