![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
It could just be me, but shouldn't the image of Tucker go in his character box like the rest of them? Dac 01:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
On 23:15, July 7, 2006 (UTC), this article was split from List of main characters in Red vs Blue#Tucker. Prior editing history can be found in the editing history of that article. — TKD:: Talk 01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Red vs Blue#Requested move for discussion. — TKD:: Talk 17:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I've rewatched Season 3 and Church did not tell them that he was the reason that Vic thinks Red and Blue are the same. He previously told them he didn't do anything, which would include convincng Vic of the discrepancy, and later on when he talks about the subject with Tucker, his exact words are "Vic just made it up to confuse us". As such, that's why I reworded that section. Dac 00:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
OK, one thing I've noticed with this article and also with the Sarge article is the fact that it's pretty much a direct copy of the original article on the list page. All it does is report the character's history, pretty much. I think we should go over it and copyedit it into something like Church or Donut's. Your thoughts? Dac 02:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
OK, my recent edit was reverted under the claim of original research, so I'd just like it to be known that the "sniper rifle" thing was based on a quote in Episode 82, which was recently released. If you still don't believe me, fine. Just pointing it out is all. 211.28.230.23 11:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. I sorta forget that not everyone gets the episodes early, so sorta my bad too. 211.28.230.23 12:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Rvbtuckerhalo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Rvbtuckerhalo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
This article is nothing but plot information. It fails Wikipedia notability guidelines. It should be merged into a short section in the List of characters in Red vs. Blue article. Pilotbob ( talk) 23:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
It is true, there is sponsor video on Rooster showing how and when Tucker died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark113 ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
check all the forums, specifically the topic that says ucker is dead, all the sponsors are saying he's dead. Shark113 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC).
http://rvb.roosterteeth.com/forum/viewTopic.php?id=1511912&page=272 Shark113 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC).
How does it make it non-canon? Shark113 ( talk) Shark113 ( talk) 02:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I am tired of constantly having to revert this. Tucker's armour colour is - indisputably - cyan. Not only is that what the gaming engine labels it, but if you measure it up to the spectrum sheets there's no question. Teal is, as you can see here, a much darker green shade, and aqua is just another name for the shade of cyan being used. Hence, Tucker's armour is, at its bluntest, cyan. Any further changes to this will be regarded as vandalism and reverted. Thank you. Dac ( talk) 01:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
This article easily deserves to stay on the Wiki. -- 24.184.200.190 ( talk) 23:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
It could just be me, but shouldn't the image of Tucker go in his character box like the rest of them? Dac 01:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
On 23:15, July 7, 2006 (UTC), this article was split from List of main characters in Red vs Blue#Tucker. Prior editing history can be found in the editing history of that article. — TKD:: Talk 01:37, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Red vs Blue#Requested move for discussion. — TKD:: Talk 17:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
I've rewatched Season 3 and Church did not tell them that he was the reason that Vic thinks Red and Blue are the same. He previously told them he didn't do anything, which would include convincng Vic of the discrepancy, and later on when he talks about the subject with Tucker, his exact words are "Vic just made it up to confuse us". As such, that's why I reworded that section. Dac 00:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
OK, one thing I've noticed with this article and also with the Sarge article is the fact that it's pretty much a direct copy of the original article on the list page. All it does is report the character's history, pretty much. I think we should go over it and copyedit it into something like Church or Donut's. Your thoughts? Dac 02:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
OK, my recent edit was reverted under the claim of original research, so I'd just like it to be known that the "sniper rifle" thing was based on a quote in Episode 82, which was recently released. If you still don't believe me, fine. Just pointing it out is all. 211.28.230.23 11:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough. I sorta forget that not everyone gets the episodes early, so sorta my bad too. 211.28.230.23 12:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Image:Rvbtuckerhalo1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:Rvbtuckerhalo2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 05:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
This article is nothing but plot information. It fails Wikipedia notability guidelines. It should be merged into a short section in the List of characters in Red vs. Blue article. Pilotbob ( talk) 23:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
It is true, there is sponsor video on Rooster showing how and when Tucker died. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shark113 ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
check all the forums, specifically the topic that says ucker is dead, all the sponsors are saying he's dead. Shark113 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 02:46, 16 September 2008 (UTC).
http://rvb.roosterteeth.com/forum/viewTopic.php?id=1511912&page=272 Shark113 ( talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 23:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC).
How does it make it non-canon? Shark113 ( talk) Shark113 ( talk) 02:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
I am tired of constantly having to revert this. Tucker's armour colour is - indisputably - cyan. Not only is that what the gaming engine labels it, but if you measure it up to the spectrum sheets there's no question. Teal is, as you can see here, a much darker green shade, and aqua is just another name for the shade of cyan being used. Hence, Tucker's armour is, at its bluntest, cyan. Any further changes to this will be regarded as vandalism and reverted. Thank you. Dac ( talk) 01:13, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
This article easily deserves to stay on the Wiki. -- 24.184.200.190 ( talk) 23:09, 10 April 2010 (UTC)