This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was this rule created and when? -- Mrwojo 04:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Is citing a page called "NFL Refs Suck" keeping a NPOV? Pats1
I am from Jacksonville, and a Jags fan, and while this is a great explaination of the Tuck Rule it is not applicable to the Jags/Pats game on 12/24/06. The reason is that there was not a question of whether Gerrard was or wasn't trying to tuck the ball, but whether or not his arm was moving forward when the ball was knocked away.
The refs dont suck. but if that game was being played in The oakland Coliseum that call would have went alot different — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.29.63.158 ( talk) 20:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
It should be a no-brainer that the Oakland Raiders offical didn't agree with it. It doesn't matter what happened he wouldn't have agreed with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.102.129 ( talk) 00:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if it was the shift in "momentum" that allowed the Patriots to win. Anonymouseducator 04:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The citation incorrectly quotes the applicable rule section as 21. The Tuck Rule is in Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.150.103 ( talk) 16:21, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
At the end of the article there was a link to http://wwww.itwasafumble.com/ That should not be here, and thus removed. 74.75.25.106 ( talk) 17:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
This article should be split into two: one for the NFL version and another for the NHL one.
The mere coincidence of the relevant verb, "tuck," is insufficient to merge the two ideas. The "tuck" in hockey has to do with how every player on every team arranges his uniform and applies at all times. The "tuck" in American football regards the arm movement of a single player (the quarterback) during a single type of activity (preparing for a pass) and is only relevant if he loses control of the ball. 75.37.19.38 ( talk) 01:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Additionally, the page makes no mention of the NHL tuck rule in application. It is misleading to state that a page is going to discuss two topics, but then only provide information about one of those topics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.210.85 ( talk) 16:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I agree fully. There is absolutely no connection between the two rules and they should definitely be separate articles [Tuck_rule_(NFL) and Tuck_rule_(NHL)]... and the NHL version will probably fail notability unless there's any actual information to go along with it. BryanHolland ( talk) 18:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was this rule created and when? -- Mrwojo 04:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Is citing a page called "NFL Refs Suck" keeping a NPOV? Pats1
I am from Jacksonville, and a Jags fan, and while this is a great explaination of the Tuck Rule it is not applicable to the Jags/Pats game on 12/24/06. The reason is that there was not a question of whether Gerrard was or wasn't trying to tuck the ball, but whether or not his arm was moving forward when the ball was knocked away.
The refs dont suck. but if that game was being played in The oakland Coliseum that call would have went alot different — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.29.63.158 ( talk) 20:11, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
It should be a no-brainer that the Oakland Raiders offical didn't agree with it. It doesn't matter what happened he wouldn't have agreed with it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.17.102.129 ( talk) 00:15, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if it was the shift in "momentum" that allowed the Patriots to win. Anonymouseducator 04:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
The citation incorrectly quotes the applicable rule section as 21. The Tuck Rule is in Rule 3, Section 22, Article 2, Note 2. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.150.103 ( talk) 16:21, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
At the end of the article there was a link to http://wwww.itwasafumble.com/ That should not be here, and thus removed. 74.75.25.106 ( talk) 17:47, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
This article should be split into two: one for the NFL version and another for the NHL one.
The mere coincidence of the relevant verb, "tuck," is insufficient to merge the two ideas. The "tuck" in hockey has to do with how every player on every team arranges his uniform and applies at all times. The "tuck" in American football regards the arm movement of a single player (the quarterback) during a single type of activity (preparing for a pass) and is only relevant if he loses control of the ball. 75.37.19.38 ( talk) 01:15, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
Additionally, the page makes no mention of the NHL tuck rule in application. It is misleading to state that a page is going to discuss two topics, but then only provide information about one of those topics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.210.85 ( talk) 16:52, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
I agree fully. There is absolutely no connection between the two rules and they should definitely be separate articles [Tuck_rule_(NFL) and Tuck_rule_(NHL)]... and the NHL version will probably fail notability unless there's any actual information to go along with it. BryanHolland ( talk) 18:33, 30 December 2013 (UTC)