This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Politics and Government This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance). Taiwan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Beautiful Formosa has been changing Tu's nationality from Republic of China (Taiwan) to Republic of China. I want to point out that there is indeed a pre-established consensus on this. And it is part of the naming convention too. Please see WP:NC-TW.-- Jerrch 20:17, 28 March 2008 (UTC) reply

We cannot just make up random things like this. For a fact, the ROC ID cards and passport say Nationality: Republic of China, only. They do not say (taiwan) or anything. Why does Ma Ying-jeou and Vincent Siew have ROC only, while the pro Taiwan independence biographies have Taiwan or ROC (TAIWAN). This is ridiculous to have double standards. Some people are obviously trying to promote a political agenda. Beautiful Formosa ( talk) 23:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I did not make up anything. WP:NC-TW is based on a pre-established consensus. Also, what you said about articles on other people does not matter. I only concerned about this article.-- Jerrch 01:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Wait, that is pretty sad. We need to strive for uniformity on Wikipedia. You can't just make it up. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. I am concerned with ALL ROC biographies. There is no reason why he is special. Beautiful Formosa ( talk) 06:18, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Uhh...Do you even know what a crystal ball is? How is Tu special? I am only following the pre-established consensus.-- Jerrch 15:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC) reply

You can't make up your own consensus. You need to follow the ROC govt. Beautiful Formosa ( talk) 03:02, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Wikipedia doesn't have to follow the ROC government. There was a pre-established consensus. See the talkpage of WP:NC-TW.-- Jerrch 03:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I'm contesting the naming standards. We need to re-evaluate the standards in line with the future ROC regime. Beautiful Formosa ( talk) 06:38, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

We usually don't reevaluate conventions with political regimes. Even if the Ma administration decides to eliminate every single references to "Taiwan" in every government organ, as long as international medias and reliable sources show that "Taiwan" is still the common name, Wikipedia will not change its conventions for politically motivated users.-- Jerrch 16:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC) reply

I remember that Tu isn't a member of DPP (joining a political party in Taiwan is more rigid than in the U.S.). But I am not so affirmative... luuva ( talk) 20:37, 9 August 2008 (UTC) reply

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• ROC National Palace Museum Seal.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 15:40, 27 June 2022 (UTC) reply