This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interestingly, Google has an application for a trademark on TrustRank. They applied for it on 2005-03-22 and the application has since been extended three times, which seems rather unusual given that they have not actually used it. GreenReaper ( talk) 18:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
~ I undid your removal of the "untrusted source". I just watched the video, and as an SEOmozer, I can assure you it is based on research by Stanford and MIT, as well as statements made by Matt Cutts @ Google. It is certainly reliable information. Thanks. -Jason Peen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.202.69.2 ( talk) 20:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Interestingly, Google has an application for a trademark on TrustRank. They applied for it on 2005-03-22 and the application has since been extended three times, which seems rather unusual given that they have not actually used it. GreenReaper ( talk) 18:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
~ I undid your removal of the "untrusted source". I just watched the video, and as an SEOmozer, I can assure you it is based on research by Stanford and MIT, as well as statements made by Matt Cutts @ Google. It is certainly reliable information. Thanks. -Jason Peen. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.202.69.2 ( talk) 20:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)