This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Trijicon was split to Trijicon biblical verses controversy on January 28 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Trijicon. |
Whose terminology is this? This article title requires a citation. I have marked it thus in the article. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 18:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I think we should move to Trijicon biblical verses controversy leaving Jesus rifles as a redirect. We are an encyclopaedia, not a tabloid journal. If folk feel strongly about leaving JR in the title it should be in parentheses.
Unless a consensus builds against this I propose to be bold in the next few days and to make the move to the emboldened title Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is this a seperate article? It should be a subheading of the main article on Trijicon. Lepeu1999 ( talk) 18:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-227297.html lists a number of them, but a forum isn't a good reference. Perhaps some of these can be researched and added. Naraht ( talk) 13:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone have any ideas on the order that the inscriptions should be in for the table in the article. I'm mildly leaning for the order of the verses in the NIV (/KJV), but that's mild. Naraht ( talk) 12:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
As the main article points out, "Trijicon specialize in self-luminous optics and night sights, mainly using the low-energy radioactive isotope tritium, light-gathering fiber optics, and batteries.", which helps explain why all of them but one refer to light, and the AccuPin exception is an unpowered fiber optic (light gathering) sight for a bow, hence the arrow reference. Without this context the company's policy looks inane; any suggestions on how to work this in? Hga ( talk) 17:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Any suggestions on how to order the table in the article with the inscriptions? Naraht ( talk) 04:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Material from Trijicon was split to Trijicon biblical verses controversy on January 28 2010. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Trijicon. |
Whose terminology is this? This article title requires a citation. I have marked it thus in the article. Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 18:19, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
I think we should move to Trijicon biblical verses controversy leaving Jesus rifles as a redirect. We are an encyclopaedia, not a tabloid journal. If folk feel strongly about leaving JR in the title it should be in parentheses.
Unless a consensus builds against this I propose to be bold in the next few days and to make the move to the emboldened title Fiddle Faddle ( talk) 09:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
Why is this a seperate article? It should be a subheading of the main article on Trijicon. Lepeu1999 ( talk) 18:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-227297.html lists a number of them, but a forum isn't a good reference. Perhaps some of these can be researched and added. Naraht ( talk) 13:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
Does anyone have any ideas on the order that the inscriptions should be in for the table in the article. I'm mildly leaning for the order of the verses in the NIV (/KJV), but that's mild. Naraht ( talk) 12:24, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
As the main article points out, "Trijicon specialize in self-luminous optics and night sights, mainly using the low-energy radioactive isotope tritium, light-gathering fiber optics, and batteries.", which helps explain why all of them but one refer to light, and the AccuPin exception is an unpowered fiber optic (light gathering) sight for a bow, hence the arrow reference. Without this context the company's policy looks inane; any suggestions on how to work this in? Hga ( talk) 17:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Any suggestions on how to order the table in the article with the inscriptions? Naraht ( talk) 04:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)