![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stumbled over this book in Google scholar investigating transmission line theory. Middle section contains a lot of math analyzing nested concentric-conductor coax configurations. Dispersion ( talk) 01:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Please add cable cross-section pictures and diagrams. - 71.174.178.251 ( talk) 22:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm inclined to add that this term - though common - is a misnomer when used to describe three-conductor coaxial cable. "Tri-axial" implies three axes (similar to "twin-axial"), and would be better applied to three core mains lead or similar. Anyone have any strong feelings about this? InelegantSolution ( talk) 09:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Stumbled over this book in Google scholar investigating transmission line theory. Middle section contains a lot of math analyzing nested concentric-conductor coax configurations. Dispersion ( talk) 01:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Please add cable cross-section pictures and diagrams. - 71.174.178.251 ( talk) 22:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
I'm inclined to add that this term - though common - is a misnomer when used to describe three-conductor coaxial cable. "Tri-axial" implies three axes (similar to "twin-axial"), and would be better applied to three core mains lead or similar. Anyone have any strong feelings about this? InelegantSolution ( talk) 09:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)