This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: British Columbia / Geography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada. Ecology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Protected areas Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I don't know Canadian law so a big question mark here but the text is straight copy from the Purpose Statement. I added that link under Ref section. Sorry I could not be more helpful woth this one. Marcia Wright ( talk) 04:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

I've taken out a couple of peacockeries - "turbulent part of the Juan de Fuca Strait", which is an odd construction anyway, and the "unique" qualifier on the stand of Garry oaks. Such writing is too-typical of ecological promotion as well as thesis-writing and should be attacked with a weed-whacker for the puffery that it is (also un-scientific in tone). Skookum1 ( talk) 12:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply