From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna ( talk · contribs) 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments from reviewer

@ The Almightey Drill: Nice work! Just a few things to fix before I can pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 04:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

@ The Almightey Drill: Good work! I'm satisfied enough to pass now. If you get a chance, could you review one of my Veronica Mars articles up at GAN. If you can't, it's okay. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Johanna ( talk · contribs) 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Third on my "to review" list. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 02:41, 8 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Comments from reviewer

@ The Almightey Drill: Nice work! Just a few things to fix before I can pass. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 04:00, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply

@ The Almightey Drill: Good work! I'm satisfied enough to pass now. If you get a chance, could you review one of my Veronica Mars articles up at GAN. If you can't, it's okay. Johanna (formerly BenLinus1214) talk to me! see my work 23:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC) reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook