This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I think that "Trapezium (astronomy)" is imprecise and slangish, whereas "Trapezium cluster" is far more descriptive. If there are no objections I tend to move the article. Opinions, please? Kosebamse 10:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The distance of the Trapezium Cluster in this article (1.6kly) is different from the one in the article about Orion Nebula (1,344±20 ly). Shouldn't they be roughly the same? Probably the actual distance is the one in the article on Orion Nebula, which is about the value obtained after that the article on Trapezium Cluster has been issued (arXiv:0709.0485v1 [astro-ph]), of course, if you can accept as correct the new measurement. Fabpan ( talk) 21:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Trapezium Cluster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I think that "Trapezium (astronomy)" is imprecise and slangish, whereas "Trapezium cluster" is far more descriptive. If there are no objections I tend to move the article. Opinions, please? Kosebamse 10:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The distance of the Trapezium Cluster in this article (1.6kly) is different from the one in the article about Orion Nebula (1,344±20 ly). Shouldn't they be roughly the same? Probably the actual distance is the one in the article on Orion Nebula, which is about the value obtained after that the article on Trapezium Cluster has been issued (arXiv:0709.0485v1 [astro-ph]), of course, if you can accept as correct the new measurement. Fabpan ( talk) 21:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Trapezium Cluster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:45, 25 January 2018 (UTC)