![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Transposition of the great vessels.
|
From WP:RfD:
Suggestion - The article needs a brief description of the embryology involved in transposition of the great vessels - i.e. failure of the spiral septum to spiral. This would give the article more content and make it less like a list of Congenital Heart Defects - any thoughts, am happy to write if required. M
I believe that there is a mistake in the terminology section, with the statement 'The term "TGV" is often used as a more specific reference to transposition of the great arteries (TGA); however, TGA only relates to the aorta and the pulmonary artery, whereas TGV is a broader term which can relate to these vessels as well as the SVC, IVC, and pulmonary veins.'
I believe that it should be written as 'The term "TGV" is often used as a LESS specific reference to transposition of the great arteries (TGA); however, TGA only relates to the aorta and the pulmonary artery, whereas TGV is a broader term which can relate to these vessels as well as the SVC, IVC, and pulmonary veins.'
The term "transposition of the great arteries" is linked back to this same article via a redirect. Either there should be no redirect (two separate articles), or the link should be removed: articles should not link to themselves. Thomas.Hedden ( talk) 14:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The image in the infobox isn't very useful to a layman, primarily because it doesn't clearly mark where the blood comes from and hence what the problem is. Another issue is that the use of abbreviations makes it confusing. It would be better to have marks like ‘to lungs’ and ‘from lungs’ directly in the image, as that would make it immediately obvious, even to the layman, what the problem is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.82.82 ( talk) 05:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022106 JFW | T@lk 21:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Transposition of the great vessels.
|
From WP:RfD:
Suggestion - The article needs a brief description of the embryology involved in transposition of the great vessels - i.e. failure of the spiral septum to spiral. This would give the article more content and make it less like a list of Congenital Heart Defects - any thoughts, am happy to write if required. M
I believe that there is a mistake in the terminology section, with the statement 'The term "TGV" is often used as a more specific reference to transposition of the great arteries (TGA); however, TGA only relates to the aorta and the pulmonary artery, whereas TGV is a broader term which can relate to these vessels as well as the SVC, IVC, and pulmonary veins.'
I believe that it should be written as 'The term "TGV" is often used as a LESS specific reference to transposition of the great arteries (TGA); however, TGA only relates to the aorta and the pulmonary artery, whereas TGV is a broader term which can relate to these vessels as well as the SVC, IVC, and pulmonary veins.'
The term "transposition of the great arteries" is linked back to this same article via a redirect. Either there should be no redirect (two separate articles), or the link should be removed: articles should not link to themselves. Thomas.Hedden ( talk) 14:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
The image in the infobox isn't very useful to a layman, primarily because it doesn't clearly mark where the blood comes from and hence what the problem is. Another issue is that the use of abbreviations makes it confusing. It would be better to have marks like ‘to lungs’ and ‘from lungs’ directly in the image, as that would make it immediately obvious, even to the layman, what the problem is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.82.82 ( talk) 05:57, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022106 JFW | T@lk 21:51, 25 October 2016 (UTC)