![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi--Sorry, I'm new to this. T-K technology is contained and acknowledged in the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard for timestamping, which is a superset of the X.509 standard that is commonplace on the Internet. Admittedly, it is an emerging technology, but I could find no guidelines with regard to writing articles on emerging technologies on Wikipedia.
Additionally, there do seem to be a number of entries for trademarked terms. For example, the "iPhone" article refers to a trademarked product released in June of this year ( http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html). Please help. Skulvis 18:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Can I get some clarification as to what is specifically objectionable in the article? Again, the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard is a national standard that has been developed over the course of many years and has received contribution and endorsement from many commercial and academic organizations. Isn't that a verifiable and reliable third-party source? I am worried that the article will be deleted, and I will have learned little about why. Skulvis 19:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed deletion template based on continuing discussion on the talk page of Mango juice talk. Skulvis 03:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hi--Sorry, I'm new to this. T-K technology is contained and acknowledged in the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard for timestamping, which is a superset of the X.509 standard that is commonplace on the Internet. Admittedly, it is an emerging technology, but I could find no guidelines with regard to writing articles on emerging technologies on Wikipedia.
Additionally, there do seem to be a number of entries for trademarked terms. For example, the "iPhone" article refers to a trademarked product released in June of this year ( http://www.apple.com/legal/trademark/appletmlist.html). Please help. Skulvis 18:03, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Can I get some clarification as to what is specifically objectionable in the article? Again, the ANSI ASC X9.95 standard is a national standard that has been developed over the course of many years and has received contribution and endorsement from many commercial and academic organizations. Isn't that a verifiable and reliable third-party source? I am worried that the article will be deleted, and I will have learned little about why. Skulvis 19:15, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Removed deletion template based on continuing discussion on the talk page of Mango juice talk. Skulvis 03:48, 24 October 2007 (UTC)