This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sea Routes are the parts of sea shores which have following qualities : 1. They should have the loading capability. 2. They should have trading type all facilities.
I have expanded the article and written a new intro. However what bothers me is that this article in particular followed a format of a definition and the a List of the trade routes. Don't get me wrong, a list is important and interesting for any reader but this article is not about a list of trade routes but about trade routes and their history and impact in development of civilizations etc.
I'll try to write a short, soured passage about the importance of trade routes to various civilizations and the political and cultural impact of these routes. Also will try and check for typos and phrasing once I recover from the current phase of fatigue due to the recent edits.
Havelock the Dane 20:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
You've clearly completed all the work, and honestly I'm amazed that you did the job you did in less than a week's time (when comparing to most holds). I completely admit that in consideration of your dedication to the article, I should have just held this one. So my apologies, and congrats! VanTucky Talk 00:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
This page links to the northern arc page which no longer seems to exist and searches for it are redirected to Varangians to the Greeks Guive37 ( talk) 05:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Shoulndt both these topics have their own section each? As it is Inland canals are part of the Maritime section but the feeling I get is that it was just pasted there, It seems out of place.
PS. Nice job on the article Havelock, its quite good. I'm sure that after a few tweakshttp://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Trade_route&action=edit# it can be renominated and achieve FA status. RIP-Acer ( talk) 12:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sea Routes are the parts of sea shores which have following qualities : 1. They should have the loading capability. 2. They should have trading type all facilities.
I have expanded the article and written a new intro. However what bothers me is that this article in particular followed a format of a definition and the a List of the trade routes. Don't get me wrong, a list is important and interesting for any reader but this article is not about a list of trade routes but about trade routes and their history and impact in development of civilizations etc.
I'll try to write a short, soured passage about the importance of trade routes to various civilizations and the political and cultural impact of these routes. Also will try and check for typos and phrasing once I recover from the current phase of fatigue due to the recent edits.
Havelock the Dane 20:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
You've clearly completed all the work, and honestly I'm amazed that you did the job you did in less than a week's time (when comparing to most holds). I completely admit that in consideration of your dedication to the article, I should have just held this one. So my apologies, and congrats! VanTucky Talk 00:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
This page links to the northern arc page which no longer seems to exist and searches for it are redirected to Varangians to the Greeks Guive37 ( talk) 05:45, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Shoulndt both these topics have their own section each? As it is Inland canals are part of the Maritime section but the feeling I get is that it was just pasted there, It seems out of place.
PS. Nice job on the article Havelock, its quite good. I'm sure that after a few tweakshttp://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Trade_route&action=edit# it can be renominated and achieve FA status. RIP-Acer ( talk) 12:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)