![]() | Tracheobronchial injury has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 20, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
tracheobronchial injury was considered fatal until a survivor was reported in 1927? |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tracheobronchial injury article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tracheobronchial injury.
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
I am currently reviewing " Tracheobronchial injury" as a "Good Article Candidate". It's another fine article by delldot; it clearly has his writing style stamped all over it. ;-) Axl ( talk) 17:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
From "Classification" section, paragraph 1: "Another way to classify tracheal lesions is to divide them into complete and incomplete lacerations." What is the difference between complete and incomplete? Clinical significance? Axl ( talk) 17:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
How about a "Prevention" section? Seat belts and air bags? Endotracheal tube design? [Reminds me of " Pulmonary contusion". :-) ] Axl ( talk) 18:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
From "Mechanism", paragraph 5: "When airways are damaged, air can escape from them and be trapped in the surrounding tissues; if it builds up to high enough pressures there, it can compress the airways." Is this pneumomediastinum? Subcutaneous emphysema? Pneumothorax? Axl ( talk) 18:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Not that it's especially important, but my preferred pronoun is 'her'. :P Thanks a ton for reviewing this Axl, I didn't even have to wait! It's good to have your knowledge and careful reviewing. delldot talk 03:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an excellent article. It comprehensively describes the subject. It complies with WP:MEDMOS, although with the additional section "Anatomy". I particularly like the "Anatomy" section. It provides a succinct introduction for unfamiliar readers to the relevant features. The article is well-illustrated. The referencing is good.
Perhaps there is some room to expand the "Prevention" section, although I appreciate the difficulty in finding reliable sources. Axl ( talk) 07:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
no archives yet ( create) |
This article indicates five possible mechanisms. Although admittedly the article is rather old (1983). Axl ( talk) 11:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Actually Shields' General Thoracic Surgery, sixth edition (2005) indicates three mechanisms, very similar to those currently described in the article. Axl ( talk) 17:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm having difficulty finding reliable sources to describe preventive measures. I'll keep looking. Axl ( talk) 20:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This picture is not an accurate representation of the bronchial tree. The "primary bronchi" are incorrectly labelled. The right upper lobe bronchus and right middle lobe bronchus are not correct. The left main bronchus is not correct. There seems to be some bizarre bronchiectasis going on in the lower lobe bronchi. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a nice picture:-
It looks suspiciously like the picture on the Encyclopedia of Science.... Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Would a link to the main anatomy article or at least using the image be in order for the anatomy section?
Jmwallach (
talk) — Preceding
undated comment added
05:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
This image needs some arrows draw on it to make it more descriptive. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 20:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
This picture, in the "Classification" section, is referenced to Riley et al., "Injury to the esophagus, trachea and bronchus", pages 544–547. I would like to know the anatomical names of where the labels are going; I suspect that the lower ones are incorrectly placed. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
In the absence of any other comments, I have removed the picture from the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Tracheobronchial injury has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
June 20, 2008. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
tracheobronchial injury was considered fatal until a survivor was reported in 1927? |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tracheobronchial injury article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tracheobronchial injury.
|
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
I am currently reviewing " Tracheobronchial injury" as a "Good Article Candidate". It's another fine article by delldot; it clearly has his writing style stamped all over it. ;-) Axl ( talk) 17:26, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
From "Classification" section, paragraph 1: "Another way to classify tracheal lesions is to divide them into complete and incomplete lacerations." What is the difference between complete and incomplete? Clinical significance? Axl ( talk) 17:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
How about a "Prevention" section? Seat belts and air bags? Endotracheal tube design? [Reminds me of " Pulmonary contusion". :-) ] Axl ( talk) 18:01, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
From "Mechanism", paragraph 5: "When airways are damaged, air can escape from them and be trapped in the surrounding tissues; if it builds up to high enough pressures there, it can compress the airways." Is this pneumomediastinum? Subcutaneous emphysema? Pneumothorax? Axl ( talk) 18:15, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Not that it's especially important, but my preferred pronoun is 'her'. :P Thanks a ton for reviewing this Axl, I didn't even have to wait! It's good to have your knowledge and careful reviewing. delldot talk 03:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This is an excellent article. It comprehensively describes the subject. It complies with WP:MEDMOS, although with the additional section "Anatomy". I particularly like the "Anatomy" section. It provides a succinct introduction for unfamiliar readers to the relevant features. The article is well-illustrated. The referencing is good.
Perhaps there is some room to expand the "Prevention" section, although I appreciate the difficulty in finding reliable sources. Axl ( talk) 07:10, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
no archives yet ( create) |
This article indicates five possible mechanisms. Although admittedly the article is rather old (1983). Axl ( talk) 11:34, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Actually Shields' General Thoracic Surgery, sixth edition (2005) indicates three mechanisms, very similar to those currently described in the article. Axl ( talk) 17:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
I'm having difficulty finding reliable sources to describe preventive measures. I'll keep looking. Axl ( talk) 20:08, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
This picture is not an accurate representation of the bronchial tree. The "primary bronchi" are incorrectly labelled. The right upper lobe bronchus and right middle lobe bronchus are not correct. The left main bronchus is not correct. There seems to be some bizarre bronchiectasis going on in the lower lobe bronchi. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a nice picture:-
It looks suspiciously like the picture on the Encyclopedia of Science.... Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Would a link to the main anatomy article or at least using the image be in order for the anatomy section?
Jmwallach (
talk) — Preceding
undated comment added
05:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
This image needs some arrows draw on it to make it more descriptive. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 20:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
This picture, in the "Classification" section, is referenced to Riley et al., "Injury to the esophagus, trachea and bronchus", pages 544–547. I would like to know the anatomical names of where the labels are going; I suspect that the lower ones are incorrectly placed. Axl ¤ [Talk] 09:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
In the absence of any other comments, I have removed the picture from the article. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)