This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Towers of America redirect. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This redirect is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve
New Jersey–related articles to
Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the
discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Every paragraph does not have to explicitly mention this building. Development in its location are properly included. I am not arguing that this counts toward notability of the buildings. But I am saying it provides context for readers. this is not a court. It is better to give the readers too much of the irrelevant, especially if it informs them about the situation, rather than too little of the relevant. Let the readers make their own judgment.
WP:BRD. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 12:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply
As I already explained at the AFD, this is irrelevant text and attempt to "beef up" an article that lacks sources, so it can be kept. The fact is there is only one source in that actually mentions the buildings.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 21:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Towers of America redirect. This is
not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This redirect is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve
New Jersey–related articles to
Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the
discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Every paragraph does not have to explicitly mention this building. Development in its location are properly included. I am not arguing that this counts toward notability of the buildings. But I am saying it provides context for readers. this is not a court. It is better to give the readers too much of the irrelevant, especially if it informs them about the situation, rather than too little of the relevant. Let the readers make their own judgment.
WP:BRD. 7&6=thirteen (
☎) 12:18, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply
As I already explained at the AFD, this is irrelevant text and attempt to "beef up" an article that lacks sources, so it can be kept. The fact is there is only one source in that actually mentions the buildings.--
Rusf10 (
talk) 21:43, 25 June 2019 (UTC)reply