This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not entirely sure what your getting at here. If you take an article such as Tramlink, its talk page has, naturally, the local wikiproject (WP:London), and the trains wikiproject (TWP). Within TWP there are various subprojects such as UK railways, UK trams, London transport, and rapid transport. Each of these subprojects has its own assessment departments (in addition to the general TWP assessment) and thus get to rate the articles importance within their own project - these ratings can be different. As to the broader picture of weather each project banner should have its own importance rating, this is not the place to discuss about it. The importance ratings are not a Wikipedia wide rating only that of its project. I'm sure there is some page somewhere in Wikipedia where this was approved. If the "UK-importance=low" is not put in, it adds to the Category:Unassessed UK Railways articles, which is something that is slowly being worked through. Pickle 17:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The opening section seems to have a rather contrived claim to make it the 'longest' railway tunnel. When opened it was the 2nd longest railway tunnel in the UK (the Severn Tunnel is 1.3km longer). After the High Speed 1 line opened it became the 3rd longest in the UK. I'm minded to alter the opening text to make this clear. Currently the Severn Tunnel isn't mentioned and the current claim of 'longest' is made by putting artificial conditions of being wholly in England and non-electrified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2ghoti ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Totley Tunnel/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 11:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The article claims, without a source, that "Totley Tunnel is now the longest wholly underland tunnel in the UK." How is "wholly underland" being defined? The Piccadilly line between Bounds Green and Barons Court is more than three times longer (19,610m vs 5,700m) and doesn't pass under any significant rivers (unless I suppose you're counting the Regents Canal), nor does the 6,400-metre Crossrail tunnel between Farringdon and Royal Oak, which doesn't cross even the canal. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not entirely sure what your getting at here. If you take an article such as Tramlink, its talk page has, naturally, the local wikiproject (WP:London), and the trains wikiproject (TWP). Within TWP there are various subprojects such as UK railways, UK trams, London transport, and rapid transport. Each of these subprojects has its own assessment departments (in addition to the general TWP assessment) and thus get to rate the articles importance within their own project - these ratings can be different. As to the broader picture of weather each project banner should have its own importance rating, this is not the place to discuss about it. The importance ratings are not a Wikipedia wide rating only that of its project. I'm sure there is some page somewhere in Wikipedia where this was approved. If the "UK-importance=low" is not put in, it adds to the Category:Unassessed UK Railways articles, which is something that is slowly being worked through. Pickle 17:14, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The opening section seems to have a rather contrived claim to make it the 'longest' railway tunnel. When opened it was the 2nd longest railway tunnel in the UK (the Severn Tunnel is 1.3km longer). After the High Speed 1 line opened it became the 3rd longest in the UK. I'm minded to alter the opening text to make this clear. Currently the Severn Tunnel isn't mentioned and the current claim of 'longest' is made by putting artificial conditions of being wholly in England and non-electrified. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2ghoti ( talk • contribs) 12:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Totley Tunnel/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 11:58, 4 October 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
The article claims, without a source, that "Totley Tunnel is now the longest wholly underland tunnel in the UK." How is "wholly underland" being defined? The Piccadilly line between Bounds Green and Barons Court is more than three times longer (19,610m vs 5,700m) and doesn't pass under any significant rivers (unless I suppose you're counting the Regents Canal), nor does the 6,400-metre Crossrail tunnel between Farringdon and Royal Oak, which doesn't cross even the canal. Thryduulf ( talk) 10:47, 8 June 2017 (UTC)