This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you attend or have attended
Toronto Metropolitan University, you may place {{
User Toronto Met}} on your userpage to display the following
userbox:
|
I propose that the information that I added to the article be added under a new controversies heading.
Here is a list of sources for the addition. http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/two-students-kicked-from-anti-racist-meeting-for-being-white/ http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/03/16/white-students-kicked-out-of-anti-racism-meeting-for-being-white-187444 http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/21646/ http://www.inquisitr.com/1927617/2-white-students-banned-from-anti-racism-group-at-university-campus/ https://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/271775-student-group-held-event-combating-racism-one-group-left/ http://www.thestarphoenix.com/life/White+students+barred+from+minority+support+meeting/10895907/story.html#__federated=1 http://globalnews.ca/news/1885540/white-students-asked-to-leave-anti-racism-event-at-ryerson/ http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/03/16/two-students-barred-from-meeting-at-ryerson-university-because-they-were-not-racialised/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.20.83 ( talk) 09:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
An article should not record prices (unless there is some encyclopedic purpose)—see WP:NOTCATALOG#5. I have asked for opinions here. Johnuniq ( talk) 04:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
It has a purpose. It shows that the university charges different amounts to different categories of its community. I will remove the price if you remove the price the university paid to purchase the facility. If prices are irrelevant, then we should also remove the tuition costs and endowment figures from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.90.34.31 ( talk) 19:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
There is no intent to right a great wrong. But if you are going to list the cost of producing the facility, it is fair game to list the pricing structure for the university community. Either delete the economics, or leave them in. But don't pick and choose. 107.5.178.131 ( talk) 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The unregistered editor who insists that this material remains in the article claims that there is a consensus here in Talk to include the material. As I understand the conversation above, two registered editors believe the material should be omitted and the unregistered editor - yes, I am assuming that the two unregistered editors are the same person - is the only one who believes the material should stay. If it's not obvious by my edits to the article, I also believe the material should be removed. So my count is 3:1 to remove the material. @ 107.5.178.131: On what basis do you believe there is consensus to retain this material? ElKevbo ( talk) 20:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
I disagree. It is not of exclusively local interest. That is a very strange argument. You need to establish consensus first. It is hard to claim undue weight for a single sentence. 107.77.172.30 ( talk) 20:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ryerson University. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X University ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) redirects here. It should have a hatnote for Xavier. Please add
{{
redirect-distinguish|X University|Xavier University (disambiguation){{!}}Xavier University}}
-- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 04:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The faculty of communication and design was changed to “The Creative School” 99.228.239.153 ( talk) 06:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
It is far more known, even still, by its incorporated former name. Per WP:COMMONNAME, it should be there still. At the very least a proper move discussion should have been held. - Floydian τ ¢ 15:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Leventio:. Thanks for finding the right spot for student-faculty ratio. I added multiple references about student-faculty ratio. I can see that you removed them, in particular these tow: one from TMU [1] and one from UOIT [2]. Could you please explain why? Also you removed the information about TMU having a very high rate (almost the worst). I think this is not inline with Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If sources say something why should it not be in the article? Thanks Pirehelo ( talk) 23:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The ratio of student to faculty to be 45.3 in 2020, which is almost three times bigger than the best university CanadaI removed as it is a clear WP:SYNTH of two different sources which presents different figures, being the Ryerson doc and Macleans (not to mention years, 2020 and 2022/2023)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you attend or have attended
Toronto Metropolitan University, you may place {{
User Toronto Met}} on your userpage to display the following
userbox:
|
I propose that the information that I added to the article be added under a new controversies heading.
Here is a list of sources for the addition. http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/two-students-kicked-from-anti-racist-meeting-for-being-white/ http://www.bizpacreview.com/2015/03/16/white-students-kicked-out-of-anti-racism-meeting-for-being-white-187444 http://www.thecollegefix.com/post/21646/ http://www.inquisitr.com/1927617/2-white-students-banned-from-anti-racism-group-at-university-campus/ https://www.ijreview.com/2015/03/271775-student-group-held-event-combating-racism-one-group-left/ http://www.thestarphoenix.com/life/White+students+barred+from+minority+support+meeting/10895907/story.html#__federated=1 http://globalnews.ca/news/1885540/white-students-asked-to-leave-anti-racism-event-at-ryerson/ http://news.nationalpost.com/2015/03/16/two-students-barred-from-meeting-at-ryerson-university-because-they-were-not-racialised/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.20.83 ( talk) 09:15, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
An article should not record prices (unless there is some encyclopedic purpose)—see WP:NOTCATALOG#5. I have asked for opinions here. Johnuniq ( talk) 04:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
It has a purpose. It shows that the university charges different amounts to different categories of its community. I will remove the price if you remove the price the university paid to purchase the facility. If prices are irrelevant, then we should also remove the tuition costs and endowment figures from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.90.34.31 ( talk) 19:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
There is no intent to right a great wrong. But if you are going to list the cost of producing the facility, it is fair game to list the pricing structure for the university community. Either delete the economics, or leave them in. But don't pick and choose. 107.5.178.131 ( talk) 13:57, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
The unregistered editor who insists that this material remains in the article claims that there is a consensus here in Talk to include the material. As I understand the conversation above, two registered editors believe the material should be omitted and the unregistered editor - yes, I am assuming that the two unregistered editors are the same person - is the only one who believes the material should stay. If it's not obvious by my edits to the article, I also believe the material should be removed. So my count is 3:1 to remove the material. @ 107.5.178.131: On what basis do you believe there is consensus to retain this material? ElKevbo ( talk) 20:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
I disagree. It is not of exclusively local interest. That is a very strange argument. You need to establish consensus first. It is hard to claim undue weight for a single sentence. 107.77.172.30 ( talk) 20:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Ryerson University. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 14:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
X University ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) redirects here. It should have a hatnote for Xavier. Please add
{{
redirect-distinguish|X University|Xavier University (disambiguation){{!}}Xavier University}}
-- 65.92.246.142 ( talk) 04:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The faculty of communication and design was changed to “The Creative School” 99.228.239.153 ( talk) 06:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
It is far more known, even still, by its incorporated former name. Per WP:COMMONNAME, it should be there still. At the very least a proper move discussion should have been held. - Floydian τ ¢ 15:16, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ Leventio:. Thanks for finding the right spot for student-faculty ratio. I added multiple references about student-faculty ratio. I can see that you removed them, in particular these tow: one from TMU [1] and one from UOIT [2]. Could you please explain why? Also you removed the information about TMU having a very high rate (almost the worst). I think this is not inline with Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. If sources say something why should it not be in the article? Thanks Pirehelo ( talk) 23:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
The ratio of student to faculty to be 45.3 in 2020, which is almost three times bigger than the best university CanadaI removed as it is a clear WP:SYNTH of two different sources which presents different figures, being the Ryerson doc and Macleans (not to mention years, 2020 and 2022/2023)