![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I question the NPOV of this article in many places.
>> Could you give some examples? Except for the adjective "beautiful" on category theory, a quick read revealed only rather well-established facts.
Relevant New Scientist article: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19325954.200&feedId=online-news_rss20
Should that instead be a link to Monoidal category? -- Hurkyl ( talk) 00:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I suspect the introduction would be quite hard to read for a lay reader: "non-Abelian" is a bit heavy to throw in in the first sentence. I don't really know the physics (only the math), or I would do it myself. -- Dylan Thurston ( talk) 18:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Statements like: "Microscopically, topological order corresponds to patterns of long-range quantum entanglement," suggest a need to sound important without actually saying anything meaningful. Simply because it is in a published paper does not mean it's worth repeating.
I could say the same thing about any ordered solid. It says nothing. Wikibearwithme ( talk) 01:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Topological order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/QuantumAlgebraicTopologyTopics.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I question the NPOV of this article in many places.
>> Could you give some examples? Except for the adjective "beautiful" on category theory, a quick read revealed only rather well-established facts.
Relevant New Scientist article: http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=mg19325954.200&feedId=online-news_rss20
Should that instead be a link to Monoidal category? -- Hurkyl ( talk) 00:27, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I suspect the introduction would be quite hard to read for a lay reader: "non-Abelian" is a bit heavy to throw in in the first sentence. I don't really know the physics (only the math), or I would do it myself. -- Dylan Thurston ( talk) 18:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Statements like: "Microscopically, topological order corresponds to patterns of long-range quantum entanglement," suggest a need to sound important without actually saying anything meaningful. Simply because it is in a published paper does not mean it's worth repeating.
I could say the same thing about any ordered solid. It says nothing. Wikibearwithme ( talk) 01:42, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Topological order. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://planetphysics.org/encyclopedia/QuantumAlgebraicTopologyTopics.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)