From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: hamiltonstone ( talk) 23:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The article appears neutral, stable and generally well-written. The images, including one with a fair-use rationale, appear to be in order, though that isn't my field of expertise. The referencing is a seldom-used style, and might be more easily read in a note-and-bibliography style, but appears consistent and therefore acceptable.

The main problem for the article is the final two sections, "awards" and "contemporary reviews". The former section lacks any references. The latter is in bullet point form, and should be re-written as a paragraph paragraphs of the article in normal text style. The section "Musical numbers and choreography" is laid out as a list, and I think might read better if changed to normal paragraph style, but it doesn't bother me as much - and it seems OK in terms of WP:EMBED. But the two final sections need to be sorted for a GA listing. Regards. hamiltonstone ( talk) 23:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Awards and review section need to be re-written, got it. I'll get on it as soon as I have enough free time available. 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 05:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Done! 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 03:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Looks good - i made one tweak for balance. Thanks for your work. hamiltonstone ( talk) 04:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Great, can't wait to see it get to FA status someday! 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 08:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: hamiltonstone ( talk) 23:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC) reply

The article appears neutral, stable and generally well-written. The images, including one with a fair-use rationale, appear to be in order, though that isn't my field of expertise. The referencing is a seldom-used style, and might be more easily read in a note-and-bibliography style, but appears consistent and therefore acceptable.

The main problem for the article is the final two sections, "awards" and "contemporary reviews". The former section lacks any references. The latter is in bullet point form, and should be re-written as a paragraph paragraphs of the article in normal text style. The section "Musical numbers and choreography" is laid out as a list, and I think might read better if changed to normal paragraph style, but it doesn't bother me as much - and it seems OK in terms of WP:EMBED. But the two final sections need to be sorted for a GA listing. Regards. hamiltonstone ( talk) 23:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Awards and review section need to be re-written, got it. I'll get on it as soon as I have enough free time available. 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 05:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Done! 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 03:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Looks good - i made one tweak for balance. Thanks for your work. hamiltonstone ( talk) 04:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply
Great, can't wait to see it get to FA status someday! 24.189.90.68 ( talk) 08:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook