This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed line saying Latham is "one of the most conservative in the country" because it's not true. By a long shot, he's not even the most conservative in the state. [1] - Jaysus Chris 01:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
173.27.52.177 is making repeated attempts ( [2] [3]) to add unsourced content to this article regarding the government shutdown of 2013. Content must have sources per WP:verifiability. CFredkin ( talk) 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone else think this article is up to GA status?-- Bigpoliticsfan ( talk) 23:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
– I think this page should be moved as he is no longer the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this name, with the New Zealand cricketer having a fair sized article. The dab page should become the primary page, with "Tom Latham" redirecting to it. This will make it easier to spot incorrect incoming links, as there were lots of these recently going to the US politician, but should have gone to the NZ cricketer. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removed line saying Latham is "one of the most conservative in the country" because it's not true. By a long shot, he's not even the most conservative in the state. [1] - Jaysus Chris 01:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
173.27.52.177 is making repeated attempts ( [2] [3]) to add unsourced content to this article regarding the government shutdown of 2013. Content must have sources per WP:verifiability. CFredkin ( talk) 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Does anyone else think this article is up to GA status?-- Bigpoliticsfan ( talk) 23:50, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. – Ianblair23 (talk) 23:53, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
– I think this page should be moved as he is no longer the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for this name, with the New Zealand cricketer having a fair sized article. The dab page should become the primary page, with "Tom Latham" redirecting to it. This will make it easier to spot incorrect incoming links, as there were lots of these recently going to the US politician, but should have gone to the NZ cricketer. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 13:01, 5 May 2017 (UTC)