This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3915832-155/utah-lawmaker-wants-porn-filtered-from 2602:30A:C7D4:9380:129A:DDFF:FE4A:7BE ( talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
In regards to the following content from the article:
Todd maintains a fundamental misunderstanding of socialism which he broadcasts through posts on Twitter.
I believe this content is applicable given the subject of the article is a politician and this sentence describes a viewpoint held by them that is verified through the multiple included sources of their tweets. As for the issue of objectivity raised by @ 65.130.56.77, sourced information should not be removed from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased. While it may be possible to word the sentence more precisely, I do believe it is impartial as it stands, per WP:NPOV. I am not sure why @ 65.130.56.77 said this sentence is an attempt at immortalization of a personal disagreement with the subject of the article, as the sentence and sources are not about any particular argument; it is about the subject of the article's broader philosophy of government. I encourage further discussion to reach a consensus. — FORMALDUDE( talk) 02:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Weiler maintains a dismissive view of socialism, communism, and other economic systems that he perceives as threatening to American capitalism.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
http://www.sltrib.com/news/3915832-155/utah-lawmaker-wants-porn-filtered-from 2602:30A:C7D4:9380:129A:DDFF:FE4A:7BE ( talk) 21:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
In regards to the following content from the article:
Todd maintains a fundamental misunderstanding of socialism which he broadcasts through posts on Twitter.
I believe this content is applicable given the subject of the article is a politician and this sentence describes a viewpoint held by them that is verified through the multiple included sources of their tweets. As for the issue of objectivity raised by @ 65.130.56.77, sourced information should not be removed from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased. While it may be possible to word the sentence more precisely, I do believe it is impartial as it stands, per WP:NPOV. I am not sure why @ 65.130.56.77 said this sentence is an attempt at immortalization of a personal disagreement with the subject of the article, as the sentence and sources are not about any particular argument; it is about the subject of the article's broader philosophy of government. I encourage further discussion to reach a consensus. — FORMALDUDE( talk) 02:29, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Weiler maintains a dismissive view of socialism, communism, and other economic systems that he perceives as threatening to American capitalism.