Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Toa Nidhiki05 ( talk · contribs · count) 15:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   I would change "Since, it has spent a total of six weeks on Hot Country Songs." to "Since then, it has spent a total of six weeks on Hot Country Songs.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Overall, a well-done article - a bit short, but fits the GA criteria. I would personally add a link to 'pop music' in the genres section since you provided several sources calling it pop. and I'm not sure about the 'promotional single' label (given it was not free), but these are very minor concerns. If there are no objections, I'll add the GA tag before the end of the day. Toa Nidhiki 05 15:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply

As no objections have been stated, I am improving to GA status. Toa Nidhiki 05 22:52, 22 September 2011 (UTC) reply