To Your Eternity has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I am leaving comments on how to further improve the article here per a request on my talk page.
In contrast to her previous work, A Silent Voice, To Your Eternity is set focus on the cast's futures rather than past.The
set focuspart does not make sense and would need to be revised. I have never read either of these two manga, but I am curious on how a story can completely focus on its characters' past without anything on their future?
Nevertheless, Fushi's continuous character arc was praised while Ōima's artwork received positive feedback based on its detailed facial expressions and environments., do not make sense. Nevertheless does not work in this context as the previous sentence was about the premiere getting positive reviews and this sentence is about the series continuing to get positive reviews. While does not work in this context either as it is used to indicate a contrast and both the character arc and artwork received praise.
he takes the form of a rock, then a dying wolf, say arctic wolf in full as just saying wolf is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
An exiled villager friend/older sister figure, I would avoid using the backslash in the prose in such a way. I would instead just say An exiled villager friend and older sister figure.
Manga artist Yoshitoki Ōima conceived the title "To Your Eternity"and
She chose "To Your Eternity", why is the title put in quotation marks and not in italics?
originated from Ōima's work in primary school, as it may be helpful for some readers.
Ōima wanted to make the protagonist neutral, and said she prefers neutral female characters., what is meant by neutral?
and the bear as obstacles of the human will., say polar bear in full as just saying bear is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
I hope these comments are helpful and best of luck with the GAN. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 ( talk) 16:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: I'll see what I can do. Also pinged Horseizedduck since he is quite better at grammar. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
→ Thank you for pinging me, was about to ask if we could begin! ... May I? Horsesizedduck ( talk) 16:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Feel free. I'm busy at work I'm a bit inactive. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: In regards to spoilers, Wikipedia's guidelines, Spoiler, we have to include such information. The only exception is in regards to the lead section which is meant to actually work as an introduction to the article ( Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section). Tintor2 ( talk) 21:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: The article's copyedit is finished. Are you interested in nominating it to GA? I would try but you have also been a really active editor here. Tintor2 ( talk) 21:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Link20XX ( talk · contribs) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Marking this for review. Will start soon. Link20XX ( talk) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Tintor2: This was a fascinating article to read through, and will be good enough with the few points below being addressed.
That is all. Link20XX ( talk) 23:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC) @ Link20XX: Thanks for the review. Ping me if there is another issue. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
To Your Eternity has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: July 14, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I am leaving comments on how to further improve the article here per a request on my talk page.
In contrast to her previous work, A Silent Voice, To Your Eternity is set focus on the cast's futures rather than past.The
set focuspart does not make sense and would need to be revised. I have never read either of these two manga, but I am curious on how a story can completely focus on its characters' past without anything on their future?
Nevertheless, Fushi's continuous character arc was praised while Ōima's artwork received positive feedback based on its detailed facial expressions and environments., do not make sense. Nevertheless does not work in this context as the previous sentence was about the premiere getting positive reviews and this sentence is about the series continuing to get positive reviews. While does not work in this context either as it is used to indicate a contrast and both the character arc and artwork received praise.
he takes the form of a rock, then a dying wolf, say arctic wolf in full as just saying wolf is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
An exiled villager friend/older sister figure, I would avoid using the backslash in the prose in such a way. I would instead just say An exiled villager friend and older sister figure.
Manga artist Yoshitoki Ōima conceived the title "To Your Eternity"and
She chose "To Your Eternity", why is the title put in quotation marks and not in italics?
originated from Ōima's work in primary school, as it may be helpful for some readers.
Ōima wanted to make the protagonist neutral, and said she prefers neutral female characters., what is meant by neutral?
and the bear as obstacles of the human will., say polar bear in full as just saying bear is unnecessarily misleading and somewhat of an Easter egg.
I hope these comments are helpful and best of luck with the GAN. Have a great rest of your week! Aoba47 ( talk) 16:29, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: I'll see what I can do. Also pinged Horseizedduck since he is quite better at grammar. Tintor2 ( talk) 16:40, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
→ Thank you for pinging me, was about to ask if we could begin! ... May I? Horsesizedduck ( talk) 16:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Feel free. I'm busy at work I'm a bit inactive. Tintor2 ( talk) 17:12, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: In regards to spoilers, Wikipedia's guidelines, Spoiler, we have to include such information. The only exception is in regards to the lead section which is meant to actually work as an introduction to the article ( Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section). Tintor2 ( talk) 21:49, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
@ Horsesizedduck: The article's copyedit is finished. Are you interested in nominating it to GA? I would try but you have also been a really active editor here. Tintor2 ( talk) 21:07, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Link20XX ( talk · contribs) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Marking this for review. Will start soon. Link20XX ( talk) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@ Tintor2: This was a fascinating article to read through, and will be good enough with the few points below being addressed.
That is all. Link20XX ( talk) 23:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC) @ Link20XX: Thanks for the review. Ping me if there is another issue. Tintor2 ( talk) 23:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)