This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tito鈥揝talin split article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
Tito鈥揝talin split is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||
Tito鈥揝talin split has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 8, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Cominform Resolution of 28聽June聽1948 publicly announced the
Tito鈥揝talin split? | |||||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
"Yugoslavia liberated itself from Axis domination, without any direct support from the Red Army as the others." - what utter nonsense is this? Could someone with at least a basic grounding in the late history of the war rewrite this part? 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 77.57.21.10 ( talk) 08:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Yugoslavia did not liberate itself. The entire Soviet Third Ukrainian Front (of which 57th Army took major part in the offensive operations against German forces in Serbia) and the entire Bulgarian Army with more than 550 000 men, both fully supported by armored units and aviation, pushed the Germans out of Yugoslavia. There's no denial of the importance and strenght of Tito's partisans, but when it comes to the actual destruction/retreat of the Wehrmacht units in Yugoslavia, this was a result of the advancing Soviet Armies. Wikipedia is supposed to present knowledge based on facts, not feed national mythos. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 78.83.69.123 ( talk) 20:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
"joint-stock companies favored in the Soviet Union"
Can any of the authors name one? Because
here it says: "Due to specifics of the Soviet economy, all enterprises in the Soviet republic as the rest of the Soviet Union were state owned and private entrepreneurship was strictly prohibited and criminally prosecuted", and as far as I know it's true.
So, what were these Soviet joint-stock companies that have led to the split between Tito and Stalin? The subject has to be cleared. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
188.163.114.36 (
talk)
23:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Extraordinary Writ聽( talk 路 contribs) 19:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
I shall attempt to review this article. This is my first time reviewing a GAN, so please let me know if something I'm doing doesn't look right. Cheers,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
My preliminary observations are as follows:
My final comments are below. As I indicated above, this is my first GA review, so I would appreciate knowing whether my review has been roughly comparable to the other ones you've experienced. If I can be of any further assistance to you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thank you! Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
GA review 鈥 see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I conclude that this article meets the GA criteria, and I will therefore list it as a good article.
Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking time to review this article. Your review was quite similar to earlier GARs I experienced in terms of attention to detail and its overall course. I found your feedback very helpful and I believe thath quality of the article, especially its prose, has benefited from the process. Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)聽
18:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Tomobe03 ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC).
Just realised that a cite must be at the end of the sentence. Added now. Sorry, did not know about this requirement - it's been a while since my last DYK Tomobe03 ( talk) 01:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
This article contains the (widely rebutted) claim that Jasenovac and its sub-camps were used extensively by the communists to intern political opponents, a claim often made by modern revisionists. [2] [3] A three-decade-old source published while Yugoslavia was still a country isn't sufficient for this extraordinary assertion to stay in this GA-level article. Hence, if no one has any objections, I will remove it. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The use of Bosnia and Croatia to describe areas of Yugoslavia that were included in the NDH is not only incorrect (as Bosnia is an ill-defined region, and Croatia is a link to the current nation, which didn鈥檛 exist at the time, and its use is therefore ahistorical), but Herzegovina is entirely left out. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tito鈥揝talin split article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources:聽 Google ( books聽路 news聽路 scholar聽路 free images聽路 WP聽refs)聽路 FENS聽路 JSTOR聽路 TWL |
Tito鈥揝talin split is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||
Tito鈥揝talin split has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 8, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the
Cominform Resolution of 28聽June聽1948 publicly announced the
Tito鈥揝talin split? | |||||||||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
"Yugoslavia liberated itself from Axis domination, without any direct support from the Red Army as the others." - what utter nonsense is this? Could someone with at least a basic grounding in the late history of the war rewrite this part? 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 77.57.21.10 ( talk) 08:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Yugoslavia did not liberate itself. The entire Soviet Third Ukrainian Front (of which 57th Army took major part in the offensive operations against German forces in Serbia) and the entire Bulgarian Army with more than 550 000 men, both fully supported by armored units and aviation, pushed the Germans out of Yugoslavia. There's no denial of the importance and strenght of Tito's partisans, but when it comes to the actual destruction/retreat of the Wehrmacht units in Yugoslavia, this was a result of the advancing Soviet Armies. Wikipedia is supposed to present knowledge based on facts, not feed national mythos. 鈥擯receding unsigned comment added by 78.83.69.123 ( talk) 20:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
"joint-stock companies favored in the Soviet Union"
Can any of the authors name one? Because
here it says: "Due to specifics of the Soviet economy, all enterprises in the Soviet republic as the rest of the Soviet Union were state owned and private entrepreneurship was strictly prohibited and criminally prosecuted", and as far as I know it's true.
So, what were these Soviet joint-stock companies that have led to the split between Tito and Stalin? The subject has to be cleared. 鈥斅燩receding
unsigned comment added by
188.163.114.36 (
talk)
23:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Extraordinary Writ聽( talk 路 contribs) 19:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
I shall attempt to review this article. This is my first time reviewing a GAN, so please let me know if something I'm doing doesn't look right. Cheers,
Extraordinary Writ (
talk)
19:00, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
My preliminary observations are as follows:
My final comments are below. As I indicated above, this is my first GA review, so I would appreciate knowing whether my review has been roughly comparable to the other ones you've experienced. If I can be of any further assistance to you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thank you! Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
GA review 鈥 see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I conclude that this article meets the GA criteria, and I will therefore list it as a good article.
Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 22:46, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much for taking time to review this article. Your review was quite similar to earlier GARs I experienced in terms of attention to detail and its overall course. I found your feedback very helpful and I believe thath quality of the article, especially its prose, has benefited from the process. Cheers-- Tomobe03 ( talk) 09:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk)聽
18:26, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Tomobe03 ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:53, 19 December 2020 (UTC).
Just realised that a cite must be at the end of the sentence. Added now. Sorry, did not know about this requirement - it's been a while since my last DYK Tomobe03 ( talk) 01:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
This article contains the (widely rebutted) claim that Jasenovac and its sub-camps were used extensively by the communists to intern political opponents, a claim often made by modern revisionists. [2] [3] A three-decade-old source published while Yugoslavia was still a country isn't sufficient for this extraordinary assertion to stay in this GA-level article. Hence, if no one has any objections, I will remove it. Amanuensis Balkanicus ( talk) 15:09, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
The use of Bosnia and Croatia to describe areas of Yugoslavia that were included in the NDH is not only incorrect (as Bosnia is an ill-defined region, and Croatia is a link to the current nation, which didn鈥檛 exist at the time, and its use is therefore ahistorical), but Herzegovina is entirely left out. Peacemaker67 ( click to talk to me) 23:48, 28 January 2024 (UTC)