![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Discussion moved from user talk:Mzajac — Michael Z. 22:07, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)]
I've just noticed you made substantial changes to one of my proudest hacks, at Titlo, with a comment that the font size is too small in Safari. Could you let me know in what way (or, rather, estimate how much) the font size was any smaller than normal image captions (such as on Viktor Yushchenko, so that I can try to debug it, please? I've just put one on the new Koppa (Cyrillic) page, which you may already have noticed. Ta muchly! — OwenBlacker 20:06, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
{{unicode| ҃}}
→ ҃
seems to do the trick: can someone add this to the examples?
I would, but I don't quite understand from the article exactly where it should be applied.
Obviously the
is replaced with whatever character you're attaching the titlo to.
HTH HAND
Phil |
Talk
12:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Seems strange that all article is in the past tense. But the titlo is normally used in modern Church Slavonic texts. -- Koryakov Yuri 16:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I am convinced the example shown in Figure 2 is incorrect.
It uses the lower-case letter "buki" (б), whereas it should use a soft sign (ь) instead. The abbreviated word is spelled out fully as "Господь", not "Господб". The actual text of the article (sans graphical example) supports this.
The version of Feb 21st appears to have used the correct character, albeit in a low-res pixel format.
A related minor quibble: I certainly salute the replacement of the tiny PNG files with these nice SVG's. However, considering this particular replacement, I would respectfully question the choice of such a modern typeface as an example for a writing mode that is predominantly historical.
81.17.231.158 15:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Use of a horizontal line to indicate an abbreviation is common, not to say ubiquitous, in Latin liturgical manuscripts from the earliest period (late antique) on. 43hellokitty21 ( talk) 12:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Discussion moved from user talk:Mzajac — Michael Z. 22:07, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)]
I've just noticed you made substantial changes to one of my proudest hacks, at Titlo, with a comment that the font size is too small in Safari. Could you let me know in what way (or, rather, estimate how much) the font size was any smaller than normal image captions (such as on Viktor Yushchenko, so that I can try to debug it, please? I've just put one on the new Koppa (Cyrillic) page, which you may already have noticed. Ta muchly! — OwenBlacker 20:06, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
{{unicode| ҃}}
→ ҃
seems to do the trick: can someone add this to the examples?
I would, but I don't quite understand from the article exactly where it should be applied.
Obviously the
is replaced with whatever character you're attaching the titlo to.
HTH HAND
Phil |
Talk
12:44, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Seems strange that all article is in the past tense. But the titlo is normally used in modern Church Slavonic texts. -- Koryakov Yuri 16:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
I am convinced the example shown in Figure 2 is incorrect.
It uses the lower-case letter "buki" (б), whereas it should use a soft sign (ь) instead. The abbreviated word is spelled out fully as "Господь", not "Господб". The actual text of the article (sans graphical example) supports this.
The version of Feb 21st appears to have used the correct character, albeit in a low-res pixel format.
A related minor quibble: I certainly salute the replacement of the tiny PNG files with these nice SVG's. However, considering this particular replacement, I would respectfully question the choice of such a modern typeface as an example for a writing mode that is predominantly historical.
81.17.231.158 15:50, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Use of a horizontal line to indicate an abbreviation is common, not to say ubiquitous, in Latin liturgical manuscripts from the earliest period (late antique) on. 43hellokitty21 ( talk) 12:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)