This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Titan IIIA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
There is a discussion at Talk:LR-87#Number of nozzles and Talk:LR-87#Affected articles that affects this article. Please discuss it there. Andrewa ( talk) 23:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This article is listed at [[ Talk:LR-87#Affected articles as one of those affected by the proposal at Talk:LR-87#Consensus? to treat all variants of the LR-87 as a single engine with two nozzles. Please raise any objections to this there.
If no objections are received, the proposal will in due course take effect in this article. Andrewa ( talk) 08:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
I edited the article to add the proper designation for the first and second stage engine, after reviewing the references. Im new so I dont know how to add things to the reflist, so i just tacked it on the bottom. Can someone add the source to the reflist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datuser01 ( talk • contribs) 14:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Instead of having "Successful" replaced with {{{{Success}}}} so it will turn green. Also did if there was a failure or a partial failure.
Like this |
---|
Success |
If disagree with edits, please revert them. 173.52.238.41 ( talk) 04:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Titan IIIA article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that a photograph be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
There is a discussion at Talk:LR-87#Number of nozzles and Talk:LR-87#Affected articles that affects this article. Please discuss it there. Andrewa ( talk) 23:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This article is listed at [[ Talk:LR-87#Affected articles as one of those affected by the proposal at Talk:LR-87#Consensus? to treat all variants of the LR-87 as a single engine with two nozzles. Please raise any objections to this there.
If no objections are received, the proposal will in due course take effect in this article. Andrewa ( talk) 08:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
I edited the article to add the proper designation for the first and second stage engine, after reviewing the references. Im new so I dont know how to add things to the reflist, so i just tacked it on the bottom. Can someone add the source to the reflist? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Datuser01 ( talk • contribs) 14:23, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
Instead of having "Successful" replaced with {{{{Success}}}} so it will turn green. Also did if there was a failure or a partial failure.
Like this |
---|
Success |
If disagree with edits, please revert them. 173.52.238.41 ( talk) 04:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)