Timothy Everest has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article just gives his wife's name as Catherine. The article should also give her surname, if possible.-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 17:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
The list of references and independent sources at the bottom of the article establishes the subject's notability beyond the shadow of a doubt. May I suggest that the non-notable template which was placed there by an IP be removed ASAP?! -- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 14:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I suggest the IP reads the article, notes the reliable sources used and reads Wikipedia:Notability (people). WP's Basic criteria says "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Timothy Everest satisfies these criteria. WP:ANYBIO says “People are generally notable if they meet any of the following standards...
I will now remove the tags. Should anyone disagree, please first raise the subject at the relevant notice boards. Daicaregos ( talk) 15:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Clear, concise. No obvious problems there.
I'll need to do a closer scrutiny of the refs, but there is a sufficient amount of sources and appear bona-fide.-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 15:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
Timothy Everest has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The article just gives his wife's name as Catherine. The article should also give her surname, if possible.-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 17:32, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
The list of references and independent sources at the bottom of the article establishes the subject's notability beyond the shadow of a doubt. May I suggest that the non-notable template which was placed there by an IP be removed ASAP?! -- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 14:11, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
I suggest the IP reads the article, notes the reliable sources used and reads Wikipedia:Notability (people). WP's Basic criteria says "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Timothy Everest satisfies these criteria. WP:ANYBIO says “People are generally notable if they meet any of the following standards...
I will now remove the tags. Should anyone disagree, please first raise the subject at the relevant notice boards. Daicaregos ( talk) 15:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
Clear, concise. No obvious problems there.
I'll need to do a closer scrutiny of the refs, but there is a sufficient amount of sources and appear bona-fide.-- Jeanne Boleyn ( talk) 15:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells ( talk) 23:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)