This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Times Now article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have scrapped and cleaned up the article which is written from Newtbrain's POV
Please keep it encyclopedic. Sfacets 06:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
This IP 212.150.97.3 keeps adding the link to watchindia.tv as the live streaming link. This link clearly doesn't carry live streaming and as such could be considered an attempt at SEO.
Request a suitable course of action. ChiragPatnaik ( talk) 06:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court Wire accused Times Now of airing an doctored Video which Times Now denied if someone is adding it back you need source other than Wire and Times Now. Wire is a party to this dispute Grebeenos ( talk) 08:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Earlier I removed an error Press Trust of India have not fined Times Now. Grebeenos ( talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Times Now was launched in 2006 in partnership with Reuters is clearly sourced and this sourced by the Business Standard and by a book. [1] [2] It the most popular channel with highest viewership in India as per the Financial Times , The Hindu and this book [3] [4] [5] Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court and the source is India Today and the Telegraph [6] [7] Grebeenos ( talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Now with your permission can I add when the channel was started that is 2006 and it was started in alliance with Reuters.Further Can I add it is India's leading channel and the most viewed English News Channel. as per the sources as per Financial Times , The Hindu and also Financial Express] and BBC calls it country's top English-language channel. IF you want me to change the wording that is fine. Grebeenos ( talk) 05:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
References
@ Akhiljaxxn: Your link [3] does not confirm anywhere that The Wire is a reliable source. Stop misrepresenting the discussion. The Wire remains one of the unreliable sources that we have to avoid for subjects such as this. Capitals00 ( talk) 15:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Times Now article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have scrapped and cleaned up the article which is written from Newtbrain's POV
Please keep it encyclopedic. Sfacets 06:19, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
This IP 212.150.97.3 keeps adding the link to watchindia.tv as the live streaming link. This link clearly doesn't carry live streaming and as such could be considered an attempt at SEO.
Request a suitable course of action. ChiragPatnaik ( talk) 06:27, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court Wire accused Times Now of airing an doctored Video which Times Now denied if someone is adding it back you need source other than Wire and Times Now. Wire is a party to this dispute Grebeenos ( talk) 08:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC) Earlier I removed an error Press Trust of India have not fined Times Now. Grebeenos ( talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Times Now was launched in 2006 in partnership with Reuters is clearly sourced and this sourced by the Business Standard and by a book. [1] [2] It the most popular channel with highest viewership in India as per the Financial Times , The Hindu and this book [3] [4] [5] Supreme Court has not awarded Rs 100 Crores to P B Sawant it has only refused the interim order of the Pune District court Times Now had to deposit Rs 20 crores and 80 Crores guarantee with the court not even a single rupee has been given to the Judge. The case is pending in the Bombay High Court and the source is India Today and the Telegraph [6] [7] Grebeenos ( talk) 08:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Now with your permission can I add when the channel was started that is 2006 and it was started in alliance with Reuters.Further Can I add it is India's leading channel and the most viewed English News Channel. as per the sources as per Financial Times , The Hindu and also Financial Express] and BBC calls it country's top English-language channel. IF you want me to change the wording that is fine. Grebeenos ( talk) 05:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
References
@ Akhiljaxxn: Your link [3] does not confirm anywhere that The Wire is a reliable source. Stop misrepresenting the discussion. The Wire remains one of the unreliable sources that we have to avoid for subjects such as this. Capitals00 ( talk) 15:15, 22 November 2018 (UTC)