This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
As we've already done it for March, should we do the same thing for April right now or wait until references start not displaying correctly? -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 22:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Seeing as no action has been taken in a week, I'm assuming we're leaving this page as is until reference overabundance happens again. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 06:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The geographical regions throughout the timeline are China, Europe, North America, and Elsewhere. And the last time I checked, neither Brazil nor Guatemala were in North America. And the WHO itself has six regions: /info/en/?search=World_Health_Organization#/media/File:World_Health_Organisation_regional_offices.svg
So, should we use it, the six continent model, the seven continent model, or what?
Greetings and felicitations. "COVID" or "Covid"? Ignoring the use in references, "Covid" seems to be the more used, but "COVID" is what is used for the Wikipedia article (and as an acronym is supported by the MOS, as well as being my personal preference). Should I clean this up (only in the article text, I mean, not the references) or leave it alone? — DocWatson42 ( talk) 08:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
For May, should we create two articles looking at the timeline of the epidemic and the responses: Timeline of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in May 2020 and Responses to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in May 2020? For the responses section, we could divide into the WHO's six global regions: Africa, the Americas, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia, and the Western Pacific. Having two articles would ensure that it doesn't become too long. It will also make sense to follow the WHO global regions as well. Andykatib 07:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, glad it has been done. Andykatib ( talk) 21:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
As we've already done it for March, should we do the same thing for April right now or wait until references start not displaying correctly? -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 22:21, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Seeing as no action has been taken in a week, I'm assuming we're leaving this page as is until reference overabundance happens again. -- Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝) 06:55, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The geographical regions throughout the timeline are China, Europe, North America, and Elsewhere. And the last time I checked, neither Brazil nor Guatemala were in North America. And the WHO itself has six regions: /info/en/?search=World_Health_Organization#/media/File:World_Health_Organisation_regional_offices.svg
So, should we use it, the six continent model, the seven continent model, or what?
Greetings and felicitations. "COVID" or "Covid"? Ignoring the use in references, "Covid" seems to be the more used, but "COVID" is what is used for the Wikipedia article (and as an acronym is supported by the MOS, as well as being my personal preference). Should I clean this up (only in the article text, I mean, not the references) or leave it alone? — DocWatson42 ( talk) 08:24, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
For May, should we create two articles looking at the timeline of the epidemic and the responses: Timeline of the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in May 2020 and Responses to the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in May 2020? For the responses section, we could divide into the WHO's six global regions: Africa, the Americas, Europe, Eastern Mediterranean, South-East Asia, and the Western Pacific. Having two articles would ensure that it doesn't become too long. It will also make sense to follow the WHO global regions as well. Andykatib 07:22, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Thanks, glad it has been done. Andykatib ( talk) 21:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)