From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earliest date and its source ref

I think the reference does not support such an early date for the first item. In any event items 1 and 2 seem to be about the same evidence from Happisburgh. This can be corrected by simply deleting the first entry, which is really unsupported. We can't have two entries supported by the same source, and referring to the same evidence, but offering different dates. In any event, our treatment of dates should err on the conservative side, if it errs at all. Macdonald-ross ( talk) 15:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Earliest date and its source ref

I think the reference does not support such an early date for the first item. In any event items 1 and 2 seem to be about the same evidence from Happisburgh. This can be corrected by simply deleting the first entry, which is really unsupported. We can't have two entries supported by the same source, and referring to the same evidence, but offering different dates. In any event, our treatment of dates should err on the conservative side, if it errs at all. Macdonald-ross ( talk) 15:05, 8 May 2018 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook