This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (JanuaryâJune 2019) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (JanuaryâJune 2018) was copied or moved into Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2019â2020) with this edit on 13:16, 28 November 2018â. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I saw that article was changed back to articles. For this resolution, there is only one âArticle of impeachmentâ, however. [1] Theoallen1 ( talk) 00:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. â Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
These items were deleted:
April 24: Facebook discloses in a quarterly earnings report that it set aside $3 billion to cover legal expenses related to Cambridge Analytica, and that it expects a $3â$5 billion fine from the FTC for its actions involving the firm, though no settlement has been reached. [1]
April 25: The Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia release a joint report on the findings of their investigation into Facebook's interactions with Cambridge Analytica and the resulting abuses of user privacy. They conclude that Facebook broke Canadian privacy laws and has been uncooperative in finding solutions that would prevent future violations despite the company's public statements to the contrary. [2]
BRD? X1\ ( talk) 00:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
References
He said he was "not familiar" with Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that commissioned the Steele dossier. [1]
BRD? X1\ ( talk) 23:22, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Fusion GPS is not mentioned by name in the Mueller report.
I'm not sure if I can be any clearer. This is relevant to this page because it is precisely what Mueller said in response to a direct question. Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier are integral parts of this. Like I said, we could give more context.
With regards to your accusation, I have not been editing this article for about two weeks now, and so cannot be described as disruptive. My most recent edits have been on this talk page. Just because I disagree with you does not mean I am being disruptive. That link you gave on IDHY mentions something critical: failure to adhere to consensus. There are only two of us discussing this. I am assuming good faith on your part, and I expect you to do the same to me. As for "sealioning," well, it's you who keep asking questions because you are not convinced. I don't have a problem with that in general, but you keep repeating the same questions even though I answered them. Nerd271 ( talk) 01:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
References
Mitch McConnell blocks the two election security measures. [1] [2]
This ", believing that elections should be managed by local and state governments rather than by the federal government" was added to the above item; BRD? X1\ ( talk) 23:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
References
@ X1\: Again, in future, please differentiate news agencies from websites. When I use my Visual Editor, it tells me that it is a website. The appearances don't look too different but they might if you include more information. Moreover, those supposedly extraneous codes are automatically included. Moreover, your sources are NPR and Bloomberg, not NPR.org and Bloomberg.com. These are news agencies, not mere websites.
You think that I am not using the Visual Editor correctly. I am not convinced. If I wanted to add a citation, I would press the Ctrl+Shift+K combination and a dialogue box would pop up. I could then pick the type of the source, fill in the details and it would format the citation for me. You could, if you wish, ask it to fill the citation automatically with just a link. I would not recommend that, though, because that's how we get NPR.org as a source rather than NPR. If I wanted to modify an existing citation, all I have to do is to double-click on it, and the same dialogue box would pop up. There is no need to struggle to format citations yourself. Nerd271 ( talk) 23:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
{{cite web}}
and {{cite news}}
" discussing the differences between the two.
Websurfer2 (
talk)
22:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)When I first created this article, the title was: "Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia and other events leading to the possible impeachment of Donald Trump" or something like that. I suggest when they finally impeach his ass we go back to the original title. Arglebargle79 ( talk) 10:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Except for the possible impeachment of the president on the obstruction of the Meuller investigation, and this may still lead to articles, this thing is winding down. The Meuller investigation is ower and after Stone is sentenced, there really isn't anything left besides that Russian company which hasn't been in the news for months. This is why I decided to change the title. There really isn't enough to have another article. Arglebargle79 ( talk) 11:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
There's a mix of tenses in this article. It is variously written in present tense ( historical present) and past tense.
Just look at November:
I personally think it historical present is fitting for timelines. Others may disgree, but I think we should have consistent tense.
HandsomeFella ( talk) 14:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
For reference, see Talk:TrumpâUkraine scandal#Draft Timeline - comments invited; expand both "Draft Timeline - comments invited" cot and "Timeline" hat. X1\ ( talk) 01:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I propose that this page be split into two pages for 2019 and 2020. This page is far larger than any of the other timeline pages, and I am worried that this page will experience out-of-memory problems in the near future. -- Numberguy6 ( talk) 18:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
An IP editor removed Category:Timelines of current events from some of the Timeline segments; is that a problem or appropriate?
X1\ ( talk) 07:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (2019)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "SenatIntelCommitReportVol2":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⥠04:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 November 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (JanuaryâJune 2019) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books ¡ news ¡ scholar ¡ free images ¡ WP refs) ¡ FENS ¡ JSTOR ¡ TWL |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (JanuaryâJune 2018) was copied or moved into Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia (2019â2020) with this edit on 13:16, 28 November 2018â. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I saw that article was changed back to articles. For this resolution, there is only one âArticle of impeachmentâ, however. [1] Theoallen1 ( talk) 00:26, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite web}}
: Missing or empty |title=
(
help)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. â Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
These items were deleted:
April 24: Facebook discloses in a quarterly earnings report that it set aside $3 billion to cover legal expenses related to Cambridge Analytica, and that it expects a $3â$5 billion fine from the FTC for its actions involving the firm, though no settlement has been reached. [1]
April 25: The Privacy Commissioner of Canada and the Information and Privacy Commissioner for British Columbia release a joint report on the findings of their investigation into Facebook's interactions with Cambridge Analytica and the resulting abuses of user privacy. They conclude that Facebook broke Canadian privacy laws and has been uncooperative in finding solutions that would prevent future violations despite the company's public statements to the contrary. [2]
BRD? X1\ ( talk) 00:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
References
He said he was "not familiar" with Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that commissioned the Steele dossier. [1]
BRD? X1\ ( talk) 23:22, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Fusion GPS is not mentioned by name in the Mueller report.
I'm not sure if I can be any clearer. This is relevant to this page because it is precisely what Mueller said in response to a direct question. Fusion GPS and the Steele dossier are integral parts of this. Like I said, we could give more context.
With regards to your accusation, I have not been editing this article for about two weeks now, and so cannot be described as disruptive. My most recent edits have been on this talk page. Just because I disagree with you does not mean I am being disruptive. That link you gave on IDHY mentions something critical: failure to adhere to consensus. There are only two of us discussing this. I am assuming good faith on your part, and I expect you to do the same to me. As for "sealioning," well, it's you who keep asking questions because you are not convinced. I don't have a problem with that in general, but you keep repeating the same questions even though I answered them. Nerd271 ( talk) 01:51, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
References
Mitch McConnell blocks the two election security measures. [1] [2]
This ", believing that elections should be managed by local and state governments rather than by the federal government" was added to the above item; BRD? X1\ ( talk) 23:30, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
References
@ X1\: Again, in future, please differentiate news agencies from websites. When I use my Visual Editor, it tells me that it is a website. The appearances don't look too different but they might if you include more information. Moreover, those supposedly extraneous codes are automatically included. Moreover, your sources are NPR and Bloomberg, not NPR.org and Bloomberg.com. These are news agencies, not mere websites.
You think that I am not using the Visual Editor correctly. I am not convinced. If I wanted to add a citation, I would press the Ctrl+Shift+K combination and a dialogue box would pop up. I could then pick the type of the source, fill in the details and it would format the citation for me. You could, if you wish, ask it to fill the citation automatically with just a link. I would not recommend that, though, because that's how we get NPR.org as a source rather than NPR. If I wanted to modify an existing citation, all I have to do is to double-click on it, and the same dialogue box would pop up. There is no need to struggle to format citations yourself. Nerd271 ( talk) 23:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
{{cite web}}
and {{cite news}}
" discussing the differences between the two.
Websurfer2 (
talk)
22:35, 25 November 2019 (UTC)When I first created this article, the title was: "Timeline of investigations into Trump and Russia and other events leading to the possible impeachment of Donald Trump" or something like that. I suggest when they finally impeach his ass we go back to the original title. Arglebargle79 ( talk) 10:55, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
Except for the possible impeachment of the president on the obstruction of the Meuller investigation, and this may still lead to articles, this thing is winding down. The Meuller investigation is ower and after Stone is sentenced, there really isn't anything left besides that Russian company which hasn't been in the news for months. This is why I decided to change the title. There really isn't enough to have another article. Arglebargle79 ( talk) 11:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
There's a mix of tenses in this article. It is variously written in present tense ( historical present) and past tense.
Just look at November:
I personally think it historical present is fitting for timelines. Others may disgree, but I think we should have consistent tense.
HandsomeFella ( talk) 14:22, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
For reference, see Talk:TrumpâUkraine scandal#Draft Timeline - comments invited; expand both "Draft Timeline - comments invited" cot and "Timeline" hat. X1\ ( talk) 01:35, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
I propose that this page be split into two pages for 2019 and 2020. This page is far larger than any of the other timeline pages, and I am worried that this page will experience out-of-memory problems in the near future. -- Numberguy6 ( talk) 18:01, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
An IP editor removed Category:Timelines of current events from some of the Timeline segments; is that a problem or appropriate?
X1\ ( talk) 07:54, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (2019)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "SenatIntelCommitReportVol2":
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⥠04:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)