![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | List of IEEE milestones was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2 August 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Consumer electronics was copied or moved into Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article contains a translation of Unterhaltungselektronik from de.wikipedia. 133863065 |
I notice there are no discoveries since the 50s. I remember recently reading about the history of Memristors - predicted to exist in the 70s and only recently produced. Presumably these might flesh out the timeline a bit? 0x0077BE ( talk) 15:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Lot's of important things missing here: integrated circuits and filters to name just two. Spinning Spark 23:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The distinction seems to have been applied inconsistently. Street lighting, for example, is listed as a discovery, and relativity as an invention. I don't expect anyone to figure out a consistent division; better to just agglomerate it all into one long chronology including any entries from Consumer electronics that are worth keeping. Jim.henderson ( talk) 01:37, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
No objection having appeared, I intend to move the list that's in Consumer electronics, to this article, probably tomorrow. This will give us three timelines, even though I said above that it ought to be one rather than two. Later, the three should be consolidated. I intend to do that part gradually, and hope for help. Currently the three use three different formats: Two column, three column, and bullet list. I prefer the bullet list as easier to implement, but perhaps other editors can offer other options or good reasons for one of the columnar formats. Jim.henderson ( talk) 12:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
will it make sense to classify by distinguishing items between being mainly solid state, liquid state and "vaporized" state of nature? a cathode ray tube is somewhat different in its nature from e.g. an LCD or a LED display. -- Alexander.stohr ( talk)
Why are we not seeing any mention of Nikola Tesla? He can be credited for a number of very influential inventions. Notably the brushless motor. 2001:569:7140:EE00:6D53:9FD4:4E82:3C36 ( talk) 21:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Why do so many entries use title case? ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't think math fits here. What about algebra? Calculus? Dfmayes ( talk) 18:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
This entire section is very strange. It's poorly formatted, contains factual errors, and is riddled with broken sentences and grammatical mistakes. I have no idea what a sentence like «It was not until 1930, he is called a " telescreen sold "at a price of 20 pounds.» is supposed to mean, and it's far from the only one like that. The section would need so much work to get it into an acceptable state that I wonder if it wouldn't be best to remove it altogether? It also feels slightly off-topic, and most of its content is probably covered by more specific timelines on the histories of television, broadcast radio, photography, etc. Scharmör ( talk) 09:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Removed the section "List of IEEE Milestones" since it was literally a mirror / copy-paste of a single ethw.org webpage. It was single source/opinion presented as fact in Wikipedia's voice, contrary to WP:WIKIVOICE. Allot of it was also redundant to rest of list. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 22:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | List of IEEE milestones was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 2 August 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from Consumer electronics was copied or moved into Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | This article contains a translation of Unterhaltungselektronik from de.wikipedia. 133863065 |
I notice there are no discoveries since the 50s. I remember recently reading about the history of Memristors - predicted to exist in the 70s and only recently produced. Presumably these might flesh out the timeline a bit? 0x0077BE ( talk) 15:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
Lot's of important things missing here: integrated circuits and filters to name just two. Spinning Spark 23:05, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
The distinction seems to have been applied inconsistently. Street lighting, for example, is listed as a discovery, and relativity as an invention. I don't expect anyone to figure out a consistent division; better to just agglomerate it all into one long chronology including any entries from Consumer electronics that are worth keeping. Jim.henderson ( talk) 01:37, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
No objection having appeared, I intend to move the list that's in Consumer electronics, to this article, probably tomorrow. This will give us three timelines, even though I said above that it ought to be one rather than two. Later, the three should be consolidated. I intend to do that part gradually, and hope for help. Currently the three use three different formats: Two column, three column, and bullet list. I prefer the bullet list as easier to implement, but perhaps other editors can offer other options or good reasons for one of the columnar formats. Jim.henderson ( talk) 12:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
will it make sense to classify by distinguishing items between being mainly solid state, liquid state and "vaporized" state of nature? a cathode ray tube is somewhat different in its nature from e.g. an LCD or a LED display. -- Alexander.stohr ( talk)
Why are we not seeing any mention of Nikola Tesla? He can be credited for a number of very influential inventions. Notably the brushless motor. 2001:569:7140:EE00:6D53:9FD4:4E82:3C36 ( talk) 21:10, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Why do so many entries use title case? ~ Kvng ( talk) 15:34, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
I don't think math fits here. What about algebra? Calculus? Dfmayes ( talk) 18:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
This entire section is very strange. It's poorly formatted, contains factual errors, and is riddled with broken sentences and grammatical mistakes. I have no idea what a sentence like «It was not until 1930, he is called a " telescreen sold "at a price of 20 pounds.» is supposed to mean, and it's far from the only one like that. The section would need so much work to get it into an acceptable state that I wonder if it wouldn't be best to remove it altogether? It also feels slightly off-topic, and most of its content is probably covered by more specific timelines on the histories of television, broadcast radio, photography, etc. Scharmör ( talk) 09:15, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Removed the section "List of IEEE Milestones" since it was literally a mirror / copy-paste of a single ethw.org webpage. It was single source/opinion presented as fact in Wikipedia's voice, contrary to WP:WIKIVOICE. Allot of it was also redundant to rest of list. Fountains of Bryn Mawr ( talk) 22:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)