This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
This article says it's semi-protected at the top, but ip addresses are editing how is that? Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, I'll ask an admin. Burner0718 ( talk) 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 31, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I do not feel that this article meets the GA requirements at this time. Many sections of the article, including specific facts, are completely uncited. "2006" is a strong example of many uncited facts and paragraphs, but there are others as well. Large sections of "Early life" and "2007" suffer from this as well. Smaller parts of "Heisman Trophy" and "Effect on homeschooling movement"There are many WP:MoS concerns, but the biggest is that "2006," and definitely "2007" read like borderline Proseline. "On this date he did this and this date he did that." It's not the definition of proseline, I admit, but whatever it is it breaks up the flow to the point of distraction and does not read well at all. There are more smaller concerns as well, but these are the ones that leading to me to list this article at good article reassessment. Cheers, CP 18:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it has enough references now, I added a few to the 2006 season. Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 19:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I've put this article back up for GA nomination because i think it now may meet the GA Criteria. Thanks Hatmatbbat10,a proud Wikipedian ( Talk) 17:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The article made some good improvements from the time before but it still lacks enough citations. I went through the article and added markings to show where citations are needed. I agree with previous editors remarks concerning there being too much chronology in the 2007 Season section. The part about the Heisman Trophy is also covered twice. I suggest that the information that is in this section be expanded, reduced, eliminated, or turned into a chronology chart as to diminish any choppiness on the account of dates. Also, I don't know why there isn't a chart for his stats. Many pages on athletes have athletic stat charts. This is still a really good article despite these concerns. User:calbear22 ( talk) 00:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Good work so far. It's well-cited, and by all appearances does a good job of covering the subject. There are, however, a few places where the prose falls short of the MOS or is just a little NPOV.
JKBrooks85 ( talk) 10:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Failed due to none of the suggestions being made in more than two weeks and no contact from any involved editors. Please contact me if you do want to make a serious effort at getting this to GA status. JKBrooks85 ( talk) 07:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection was recently lifted. Today I see no fewer than 7 edits of vandalism by anonymous users. And this is during the offseason! WTStoffs ( talk) 22:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
The repeated vandalism has started again. It's really misguided to remove protection during football season.
Zeng8r (
talk) 00:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Does the table with the total balloting for the 2007 Heisman Trophy really need its own subsection--let alone exist in the article? Taking a look at Troy Smith's article, the information is succinctly written into the Heisman Trophy section of the article. I will try to make the Heisman section on this article look similar soon if nobody expresses opposition to this. WTStoffs ( talk) 23:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
A while ago, this article was in the discussion for Good Article status, but it looks that since then, few changes have been made that help its criteria. We need people who can edit through this article and find anything that doesn't sound right and it needs to be corrected. Some sections seem too lengthy and it seems that the information can be shown by using less words. I'm not very good at finding errors, but if told, I can try and fix them. I would really like to get this article up to GA status, and hopefully futher. Thanks, Hatmatbbat10 Talk to me 05:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
In the information box, SEC is linked to Securities and Exchange Commission. Someone with privileges should fix that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.138.47.71 ( talk) 02:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, good catch. Fixed.
Zeng8r (
talk) 02:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe the article on Tim should include the following in the 2008 section prior to the Georgia game paragraph...
On September 27, 2008 following a devastating 30-31 loss in the Swamp to the Rebels of the University of Mississippi, Tebow addressed the media with what many believe were words that inspired Florida's remaining BCS National Championship run. Tebow stated, "To the fans and everybody of Gator Nation, I'm sorry. Extremely sorry. We wanted an undefeated season, that was my goal, something Florida has never done here. I promise you one thing, a lot of good will come out of this. "You will never see any player in the entire country play as hard as I will play the rest of the season. You will never see another player push his team as hard as I will push everybody the rest of the season. You will never see a team play harder than we will the rest of the season. God bless." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96vAbtpakLg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sienadad ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
The only problem with this is that it is biased a little bit and is an opinion to whether it is important or not. Although I am a Gator fan some people don't think what he said was very important, other do. Also words like devastating make it a little bit biased towards Tebow and the Gators, and remember all articles must have a nuetral point of view. Thanks for your suggestion though! Hatmatbbat10 Talk to me 21:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
In the "Statistics" section, it lists his overall completion percentage as 67.8, higher than any single year he played. It turns out that 448 / 681 = 0.657856094, which gives an overall completion percentage of ~65.8%. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnObfuscator ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
== Total Passing Yards Error ++
The career passing yards should subtotal to 8,557 and not 8,457. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.136.112.12 ( talk) 21:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
2009 stats need to be updated to account for the 2010 Sugar Bowl, all career subtotals need to be updated as well currently they don't add correctly. Career Passing Rating needs to be calculated correctly from the updated career stats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.69.58 ( talk) 07:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The career passer rating of 176.00 is also incorrect. 661-985 for 9286 yards, with 88 TD's and 15 INT's = 172.73340101522842. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G8R8U2 ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Already done Celestra ( talk) 18:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
On January 7, 2007, Tebow was featured prominently in an ESPN “Outside The Lines” feature on homeschooled athletes seeking equal access to high school athletics in other states. Because a homeschooler's access to public and private school athletic functions vary by state, Tebow and Washington Redskins defensive end Jason Taylor (who was allowed to play at his local high school in Pennsylvania) argue in favor of extending the right to play for local teams to more states.
Should read:
On January 7, 2007, Tebow was featured prominently in an ESPN “Outside The Lines” feature on homeschooled athletes seeking equal access to high school athletics in other states. Because a homeschooler's access to public and private school athletic functions vary by state, Tebow and Miami Dolphins defensive end Jason Taylor (who was allowed to play at his local high school in Pennsylvania) argue in favor of extending the right to play for local teams to more states
98.218.157.195 ( talk) 16:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
the aritle never said what religon Tebow practices. We know he was born to christian missionaries but what denomination. This is of intrest because Tebow frequently talks about his faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.135.124.161 ( talk) 19:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Article has a quoted item "bad concussion" but following the reference (58), there is no mention of the word "bad" when describing the concussion. Perhaps it was taken from someone in the comments? If so, that doesn't seem very reliable. As far as I know, there has been no mention of the grade of concussion Tebow suffered. Either way, having it in quotes is misleading as it seems that "bad concussion" was mentioned specifically in that article, which I can't find.
From Professional career: "Questions about Tebow's possible success at the professional level has also be cited..."
Shouldn't that be "Questions... have also been cited..."? Sorry for nit-picking! Tufelkinder ( talk) 04:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
What was the major for the degree he earned while studying at the university? 23:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.106.168.45 ( talk)
Male Athlete of the Year (2008) ( http://www.gainesville.com/article/20090623/ARTICLES/906239938?Title=Tebow-named-SEC-male-athlete-of-the-year)
SEC Scholar-Athlete of the Year (2009) ( http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=17120)
Sports Illustrated College football Player of the Decade ( http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/magazine/specials/2000s/12/15/cfb-highlights-lowlights/index.html)
Academic All-America of the Year (2008)( http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=14920) (2009)( http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4685592)
Sugar Bowl Most Outstanding Player (2010) ( http://allstatesugarbowl.org/site.php?pageID=19&newsID=131)
Lowe’s Senior CLASS Award Football Winner (2009) ( http://www.seniorclassaward.com/news/view/floridas_tim_tebow_selected_as_2009_lowes_senior_class_award_football_winne/) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dexufl ( talk • contribs) 08:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
It's listed as 176.0, and that isn't accurate. 661-985 for 9286 yards, with 88 TD's and 15 INT's equates to a QB passer rating of 172.73340101522842. Actually, even that is inaccurate, as Tim's actual numbers are Tot.: 661-995 for 9,285 yards 66.4% 88 TD's 16 INT's 80 (long), which calculates to a rating of 170.78793969849244, or 170.79.
G8R8U2 ( talk) 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Tebows Stats for 2009 are slightly off 213 Completions, 314 Attempts QB Rating 164.17 should be the correct, this according to ESPN# —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.48.60.221 ( talk) 07:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Reference in the article needs to be added about Tebow's involvement with anti-gay organizations:
http://ebar.com/columns/column.php?sec=sports
Native94080 (
talk) 06:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
More news articles from eBar about Tebow and the anti-gay Focus On The Family group:
http://www.ebar.com/arts/art_article.php?sec=lavendertube&article=111
http://www.ebar.com/common/inc/article_print.php?sec=sports&article=275
Native94080 (
talk) 07:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Nothing that this organization stands for suggests that they care about life. So the description of this organization in this article should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.212.55 ( talk) 08:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
As I mentioned on my talk page in response to a (rather rude) comment from Nwerle, wikipedia is not a soapbox, and this article is a totally inappropriate place to promote one's view on abortion. You're proposing to qualify a published quote which came directly from the mother of the subject of the article, apparently for political reasons. Should we stick "according to his mother" in front of every other tidbit of info that came from that Gainesville Sun piece? It defies common sense, imo. Zeng8r ( talk) 20:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Instant reverts are going too far, imo. Maybe a reasonable wording can be formulated. Zeng8r ( talk) 18:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
On January 29th, 2010 did an interview with radaronline.com [1]in that interview she talks about doing some investigating into Tim's mother's story about Pam's Doctors recommending an abortion.
In her interview with RadarOnline.com points out factual inconsistencies with Pam's story. One glaring fact is that the act of abortion is totally illegal in the majority Catholic country of the Philippines - under all circumstances including rape and incest, and even without a provision in the circumstance that the mother's life is in danger. The law has been in effect since 1930. [2]
Also physicians and midwives who perform abortions in the Philippines face six years in prison, and may have their licenses suspended or revoked, and that women who receive abortions – no matter the reason – may be punished with imprisonment for two to six years. [3] Thoruen ( talk) 18:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Thoruen
I must disagree with you.
Nwerle, editing your comments after others have responded to your original statement is discouraged, as explained here. Zeng8r ( talk) 01:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Not sure why, but I added a source that wasn't a blog, and it only took 7 minutes before someone ripped it out. Evidently the only credible sources for this article are only the ones that reflect positively on the subject... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolgui ( talk • contribs) 07:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
As of 2010, Tim Tebow has recently launched his own foundation website, which should be added under professional career Tim Tebow Foundation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argumentdesk ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 2 February 2010
Since there is considerable controversy around the subject, perhaps we could change the section about Tim Tebow's mother's pregnancy problems to say that she claims that doctors recommended she get an abortion. The link provided is based on an interview with her and provides no corroborating evidence. Eiad77 ( talk) 08:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
: D'oh ! nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
:: hearsay even by the god paul McCartney should be suspect, (god part was a joke). nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::: and what Paul says John said is HEARSAY!!!!!!!!! nocustomdontknowhow 21:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GADFLY46 (
talk •
contribs)
::: press ? abc, cbs
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/tim-tebow-super-bowl-ad-cbs-air-controversial/story?id=9667638
http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2010/02/03/should-cbs-show-tim-tebows-anti-abortion-super-bowl-ad.html nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::: you said press - so thats what I put, you want SOURCES 1 -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/tim-tebow-super-bowl-ad-m_n_442808.html 2 -
http://womensrights.change.org/blog/view/is_the_anti-choice_tim_tebow_super_bowl_ad_a_lie 3 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m3X6MghcNI 4 -
http://chattahbox.com/entertainment/2010/01/30/gloria-allred-says-tim-tebows-superbowl-ad-misleading-advertising/ 5 -
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_bianchi/2010/02/tim-tebow-abortion-story-is-being-swiftboated-by-womens-rights-activist-gloria-allred.html 7 I even include a "pro-life" source
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5943.html, next you will be saying MALE oriented sources only. nocustomdontknowhow 21:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::::: I think orlando sentinal is a NEWSPAPER, The following are NOT blogs they are news sources, Examiner, Gloria-Allred-challenges-CBS-over-Tim-Tebow-Super-Bowl-ad--says-its-misleading, AS well as LIFENEWS and chatttahnews and the week. Google lists 307 news sites! new one salt lake NEWSPAPER
http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_14327273
Nwerle (
talk) 06:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
:::: another news source
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/03/kevin-mccullough-tim-tebow-pam-tebow-abortion-super-bowl-ad-allred/
Nwerle (
talk)
Huffington post is a blog! gadfly 06:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GADFLY46 ( talk • contribs)
Is the Dawkins comment not notable and relevant to this article?-- Xris0 ( talk) 20:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Who reverted my source , The Colorado Springs Gazette, the newspaper from the HQ city of the Focus on the Family and left the puff piece by a SPORTS writer with PRO LIFE affiliations! gadfly46 22:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't think Dawkins quote belongs here. Specific quotes from critics is excessive in my opinion, although a general overview would be fine. Boromir123 ( talk) 02:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
It is NOT Tim Tebow's participation in ad that is has drawn controversy, it is HIS mothers's statements without proof that are the controversy! If he was in ad saying abortion is not good, that would be his right, noone ahs right to lie on US airways.
:: especially when it includes critic on ayn randians running wikipedia for their own purposes. Gadfly46 03:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GADFLY46 (
talk •
contribs)
I normally ignore name-calling and the like, but I'm sorry, somebody calling me an "ayn randian" is about the most hilariously ironic thing I've ever read. Seriously, you have no idea. lol lol lol, etc.
Ahem. Anyway, besides violating the same policies quoted and linked nauseum above, the latest edits put WAY
too much emphasis (there's another linked wikipolicy) on the Super Bowl ad, making the section about as long as sections about record-shattering football seasons. This is an article about a guy who's in a commercial, NOT about the commercial itself. There's no reason for putting in arguments about CBS's advertising policies and history or the intricacies and history of Philippino reproductive law in a biography of a 23 year-old football player.
Among all the issues with these edits, the main problem is that a few editors seem to be
inappropriately trying to slant the article for political reasons. Feel free to hold picket signs, write columns or letters (salon.com is good for that), call CBS and/or your congressperson, or rant all you want in your own blog to get your point across. But wikipedia is NOT the forum for advocacy or activism, especially in a
biography of a living person, which are even more tightly regulated than other articles. Please understand the guidelines before continuing. Thanks.
Zeng8r (
talk) 12:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
What is the relevance of including this as a separate section? Should each biographic wiki page include every sort of controversial activity the person engaged in throughout their life? If the section is to remain it must include an accurate description of the controversy. It is not simply a "pro-life ad". It is clearly a major controversy throughout the nation, not restricted to feminist organizations. To uphold the integrity of the page and the website in general all available information about the controversy must be included. It is unfair and blatantly wrong to include a few sentences about this major controversy. Either include a detailed, comprehensive description of the controversy or remove the section entirely. Furthermore, the "protecting" of this page by those with vested interests in the subject is inappropriate at best and unethical at worst. If wikipedia is to have legitimacy in the eyes of society at large, accuracy, transparency, and honesty must be upheld. -- Calboarder24 ( talk) 03:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Here is a NEWS ITEM regarding Tebow in a NEWSPAPER http://www.gazette.com/articles/tebow-93671-bowl-well.html and the REPORTER (unlike the wiki gestapo ) puts in facts . gadfly46 18:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
gadfly46 02:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
In the end, the commercial itself isn't controversial at all: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=je0lYPUvTZc. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Can we remove the pro-life activist category? He appeared in one commerical, that hardly makes him an activist. Inclusion into such categories should involve long involvment with a political movement, not one instance of a person declaring their belief. If he continues to comment on abortion-related topics or becomes activly (and visibly) involved with the movement, he can be added. But as it stands right now, he no more belongs in the category, then say, Alanis Morissette belongs in the pro-choice activists category since she has stated she is pro-choice before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.13.140.153 ( talk) 02:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I came here as the BBC article about the ad controversy [4] mentions his "trademark biblical references painted underneath his eyes". There's nothing about them in the Wiki article. Can anyone expand? What is the ref? Why does he do it? How long has he been doing it for? Thanks 86.159.39.99 ( talk) 18:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
So I changed the name of the external link of the ad from "Tebow Pro-Life Ad" to "Tebow Super Bowl XLIV Ad." Grundle2600 ( talk) 03:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Ea Sports have named Tim Tebow the cover athlete for Ncaa Football 11 on April 7, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.191.74 ( talk) 18:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
The source provided for the statement regarding the circumstances of Tebow's birth makes no mention of those circumstances. This source reference should be removed and replaced with "reference needed". See specifically the text of source [1]. There is no information regarding Pam Tebow's health at the time of Tim Tebow's birth or any mention of a physician advising her to abort the preganancy.
98.198.236.51 ( talk) 23:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
A number of journalists have already started using the nickname. It's catching on, I see no reason why it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NKS22 ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I notice there's a bit of an argument (via reverts) over Tebow's jersey number in the Broncos - #15 or #10? I did a Google News search and couldn't find anything definitive, so I am blanking that infobox field for now. If someone has a good source, let me know. Thanks, WordyGirl90 21:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/media/ALeqM5j7ej23gb1BIgbpcSq95L_1krWzpg?size=l(him in broncos mini camp,broncos uniform) DaredeviLogan84 ( talk) 16:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
For the heisman trophy section; you should change underclassmen to sophmore. There have been nearly a dozen juniors to win the award.
66.66.77.5 ( talk) 03:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Tim Tebow is no longer the incumbent Best Male College Athlete ESPY Award Winner. John Wall is.
claytnb ( talk) 14:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Done PrincessofLlyr royal court 14:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Why isn't there a mention if his statement to the effect that he is a virgin? I think it is notable and has several verifiable reliable sources. Lawyer2b ( talk) 12:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
This article says it's semi-protected at the top, but ip addresses are editing how is that? Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I don't know, I'll ask an admin. Burner0718 ( talk) 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 31, 2024, compares against the six good article criteria:
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I do not feel that this article meets the GA requirements at this time. Many sections of the article, including specific facts, are completely uncited. "2006" is a strong example of many uncited facts and paragraphs, but there are others as well. Large sections of "Early life" and "2007" suffer from this as well. Smaller parts of "Heisman Trophy" and "Effect on homeschooling movement"There are many WP:MoS concerns, but the biggest is that "2006," and definitely "2007" read like borderline Proseline. "On this date he did this and this date he did that." It's not the definition of proseline, I admit, but whatever it is it breaks up the flow to the point of distraction and does not read well at all. There are more smaller concerns as well, but these are the ones that leading to me to list this article at good article reassessment. Cheers, CP 18:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it has enough references now, I added a few to the 2006 season. Hatmatbbat10 ( talk) 19:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
I've put this article back up for GA nomination because i think it now may meet the GA Criteria. Thanks Hatmatbbat10,a proud Wikipedian ( Talk) 17:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The article made some good improvements from the time before but it still lacks enough citations. I went through the article and added markings to show where citations are needed. I agree with previous editors remarks concerning there being too much chronology in the 2007 Season section. The part about the Heisman Trophy is also covered twice. I suggest that the information that is in this section be expanded, reduced, eliminated, or turned into a chronology chart as to diminish any choppiness on the account of dates. Also, I don't know why there isn't a chart for his stats. Many pages on athletes have athletic stat charts. This is still a really good article despite these concerns. User:calbear22 ( talk) 00:01, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Good work so far. It's well-cited, and by all appearances does a good job of covering the subject. There are, however, a few places where the prose falls short of the MOS or is just a little NPOV.
JKBrooks85 ( talk) 10:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Failed due to none of the suggestions being made in more than two weeks and no contact from any involved editors. Please contact me if you do want to make a serious effort at getting this to GA status. JKBrooks85 ( talk) 07:56, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection was recently lifted. Today I see no fewer than 7 edits of vandalism by anonymous users. And this is during the offseason! WTStoffs ( talk) 22:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
The repeated vandalism has started again. It's really misguided to remove protection during football season.
Zeng8r (
talk) 00:32, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Does the table with the total balloting for the 2007 Heisman Trophy really need its own subsection--let alone exist in the article? Taking a look at Troy Smith's article, the information is succinctly written into the Heisman Trophy section of the article. I will try to make the Heisman section on this article look similar soon if nobody expresses opposition to this. WTStoffs ( talk) 23:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
A while ago, this article was in the discussion for Good Article status, but it looks that since then, few changes have been made that help its criteria. We need people who can edit through this article and find anything that doesn't sound right and it needs to be corrected. Some sections seem too lengthy and it seems that the information can be shown by using less words. I'm not very good at finding errors, but if told, I can try and fix them. I would really like to get this article up to GA status, and hopefully futher. Thanks, Hatmatbbat10 Talk to me 05:33, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
In the information box, SEC is linked to Securities and Exchange Commission. Someone with privileges should fix that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.138.47.71 ( talk) 02:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, good catch. Fixed.
Zeng8r (
talk) 02:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe the article on Tim should include the following in the 2008 section prior to the Georgia game paragraph...
On September 27, 2008 following a devastating 30-31 loss in the Swamp to the Rebels of the University of Mississippi, Tebow addressed the media with what many believe were words that inspired Florida's remaining BCS National Championship run. Tebow stated, "To the fans and everybody of Gator Nation, I'm sorry. Extremely sorry. We wanted an undefeated season, that was my goal, something Florida has never done here. I promise you one thing, a lot of good will come out of this. "You will never see any player in the entire country play as hard as I will play the rest of the season. You will never see another player push his team as hard as I will push everybody the rest of the season. You will never see a team play harder than we will the rest of the season. God bless." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96vAbtpakLg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sienadad ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
The only problem with this is that it is biased a little bit and is an opinion to whether it is important or not. Although I am a Gator fan some people don't think what he said was very important, other do. Also words like devastating make it a little bit biased towards Tebow and the Gators, and remember all articles must have a nuetral point of view. Thanks for your suggestion though! Hatmatbbat10 Talk to me 21:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
In the "Statistics" section, it lists his overall completion percentage as 67.8, higher than any single year he played. It turns out that 448 / 681 = 0.657856094, which gives an overall completion percentage of ~65.8%. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AnObfuscator ( talk • contribs) 05:32, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
== Total Passing Yards Error ++
The career passing yards should subtotal to 8,557 and not 8,457. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.136.112.12 ( talk) 21:48, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
2009 stats need to be updated to account for the 2010 Sugar Bowl, all career subtotals need to be updated as well currently they don't add correctly. Career Passing Rating needs to be calculated correctly from the updated career stats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.249.69.58 ( talk) 07:53, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The career passer rating of 176.00 is also incorrect. 661-985 for 9286 yards, with 88 TD's and 15 INT's = 172.73340101522842. —Preceding unsigned comment added by G8R8U2 ( talk • contribs) 04:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Already done Celestra ( talk) 18:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
On January 7, 2007, Tebow was featured prominently in an ESPN “Outside The Lines” feature on homeschooled athletes seeking equal access to high school athletics in other states. Because a homeschooler's access to public and private school athletic functions vary by state, Tebow and Washington Redskins defensive end Jason Taylor (who was allowed to play at his local high school in Pennsylvania) argue in favor of extending the right to play for local teams to more states.
Should read:
On January 7, 2007, Tebow was featured prominently in an ESPN “Outside The Lines” feature on homeschooled athletes seeking equal access to high school athletics in other states. Because a homeschooler's access to public and private school athletic functions vary by state, Tebow and Miami Dolphins defensive end Jason Taylor (who was allowed to play at his local high school in Pennsylvania) argue in favor of extending the right to play for local teams to more states
98.218.157.195 ( talk) 16:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
the aritle never said what religon Tebow practices. We know he was born to christian missionaries but what denomination. This is of intrest because Tebow frequently talks about his faith. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.135.124.161 ( talk) 19:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Article has a quoted item "bad concussion" but following the reference (58), there is no mention of the word "bad" when describing the concussion. Perhaps it was taken from someone in the comments? If so, that doesn't seem very reliable. As far as I know, there has been no mention of the grade of concussion Tebow suffered. Either way, having it in quotes is misleading as it seems that "bad concussion" was mentioned specifically in that article, which I can't find.
From Professional career: "Questions about Tebow's possible success at the professional level has also be cited..."
Shouldn't that be "Questions... have also been cited..."? Sorry for nit-picking! Tufelkinder ( talk) 04:42, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
What was the major for the degree he earned while studying at the university? 23:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.106.168.45 ( talk)
Male Athlete of the Year (2008) ( http://www.gainesville.com/article/20090623/ARTICLES/906239938?Title=Tebow-named-SEC-male-athlete-of-the-year)
SEC Scholar-Athlete of the Year (2009) ( http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=17120)
Sports Illustrated College football Player of the Decade ( http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/magazine/specials/2000s/12/15/cfb-highlights-lowlights/index.html)
Academic All-America of the Year (2008)( http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=14920) (2009)( http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=4685592)
Sugar Bowl Most Outstanding Player (2010) ( http://allstatesugarbowl.org/site.php?pageID=19&newsID=131)
Lowe’s Senior CLASS Award Football Winner (2009) ( http://www.seniorclassaward.com/news/view/floridas_tim_tebow_selected_as_2009_lowes_senior_class_award_football_winne/) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dexufl ( talk • contribs) 08:06, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
It's listed as 176.0, and that isn't accurate. 661-985 for 9286 yards, with 88 TD's and 15 INT's equates to a QB passer rating of 172.73340101522842. Actually, even that is inaccurate, as Tim's actual numbers are Tot.: 661-995 for 9,285 yards 66.4% 88 TD's 16 INT's 80 (long), which calculates to a rating of 170.78793969849244, or 170.79.
G8R8U2 ( talk) 04:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Tebows Stats for 2009 are slightly off 213 Completions, 314 Attempts QB Rating 164.17 should be the correct, this according to ESPN# —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.48.60.221 ( talk) 07:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Reference in the article needs to be added about Tebow's involvement with anti-gay organizations:
http://ebar.com/columns/column.php?sec=sports
Native94080 (
talk) 06:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
More news articles from eBar about Tebow and the anti-gay Focus On The Family group:
http://www.ebar.com/arts/art_article.php?sec=lavendertube&article=111
http://www.ebar.com/common/inc/article_print.php?sec=sports&article=275
Native94080 (
talk) 07:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Nothing that this organization stands for suggests that they care about life. So the description of this organization in this article should be changed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.61.212.55 ( talk) 08:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
As I mentioned on my talk page in response to a (rather rude) comment from Nwerle, wikipedia is not a soapbox, and this article is a totally inappropriate place to promote one's view on abortion. You're proposing to qualify a published quote which came directly from the mother of the subject of the article, apparently for political reasons. Should we stick "according to his mother" in front of every other tidbit of info that came from that Gainesville Sun piece? It defies common sense, imo. Zeng8r ( talk) 20:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Instant reverts are going too far, imo. Maybe a reasonable wording can be formulated. Zeng8r ( talk) 18:41, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
On January 29th, 2010 did an interview with radaronline.com [1]in that interview she talks about doing some investigating into Tim's mother's story about Pam's Doctors recommending an abortion.
In her interview with RadarOnline.com points out factual inconsistencies with Pam's story. One glaring fact is that the act of abortion is totally illegal in the majority Catholic country of the Philippines - under all circumstances including rape and incest, and even without a provision in the circumstance that the mother's life is in danger. The law has been in effect since 1930. [2]
Also physicians and midwives who perform abortions in the Philippines face six years in prison, and may have their licenses suspended or revoked, and that women who receive abortions – no matter the reason – may be punished with imprisonment for two to six years. [3] Thoruen ( talk) 18:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Thoruen
I must disagree with you.
Nwerle, editing your comments after others have responded to your original statement is discouraged, as explained here. Zeng8r ( talk) 01:41, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Not sure why, but I added a source that wasn't a blog, and it only took 7 minutes before someone ripped it out. Evidently the only credible sources for this article are only the ones that reflect positively on the subject... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolgui ( talk • contribs) 07:25, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
As of 2010, Tim Tebow has recently launched his own foundation website, which should be added under professional career Tim Tebow Foundation —Preceding unsigned comment added by Argumentdesk ( talk • contribs) 18:56, 2 February 2010
Since there is considerable controversy around the subject, perhaps we could change the section about Tim Tebow's mother's pregnancy problems to say that she claims that doctors recommended she get an abortion. The link provided is based on an interview with her and provides no corroborating evidence. Eiad77 ( talk) 08:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
: D'oh ! nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
:: hearsay even by the god paul McCartney should be suspect, (god part was a joke). nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::: and what Paul says John said is HEARSAY!!!!!!!!! nocustomdontknowhow 21:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GADFLY46 (
talk •
contribs)
::: press ? abc, cbs
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/tim-tebow-super-bowl-ad-cbs-air-controversial/story?id=9667638
http://www.usnews.com/articles/opinion/2010/02/03/should-cbs-show-tim-tebows-anti-abortion-super-bowl-ad.html nocustomdontknowhow 18:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::: you said press - so thats what I put, you want SOURCES 1 -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/29/tim-tebow-super-bowl-ad-m_n_442808.html 2 -
http://womensrights.change.org/blog/view/is_the_anti-choice_tim_tebow_super_bowl_ad_a_lie 3 -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8m3X6MghcNI 4 -
http://chattahbox.com/entertainment/2010/01/30/gloria-allred-says-tim-tebows-superbowl-ad-misleading-advertising/ 5 -
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sports_bianchi/2010/02/tim-tebow-abortion-story-is-being-swiftboated-by-womens-rights-activist-gloria-allred.html 7 I even include a "pro-life" source
http://www.lifenews.com/nat5943.html, next you will be saying MALE oriented sources only. nocustomdontknowhow 21:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
::::: I think orlando sentinal is a NEWSPAPER, The following are NOT blogs they are news sources, Examiner, Gloria-Allred-challenges-CBS-over-Tim-Tebow-Super-Bowl-ad--says-its-misleading, AS well as LIFENEWS and chatttahnews and the week. Google lists 307 news sites! new one salt lake NEWSPAPER
http://www.sltrib.com/News/ci_14327273
Nwerle (
talk) 06:26, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
:::: another news source
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/02/03/kevin-mccullough-tim-tebow-pam-tebow-abortion-super-bowl-ad-allred/
Nwerle (
talk)
Huffington post is a blog! gadfly 06:56, 4 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by GADFLY46 ( talk • contribs)
Is the Dawkins comment not notable and relevant to this article?-- Xris0 ( talk) 20:58, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
Who reverted my source , The Colorado Springs Gazette, the newspaper from the HQ city of the Focus on the Family and left the puff piece by a SPORTS writer with PRO LIFE affiliations! gadfly46 22:43, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
I don't think Dawkins quote belongs here. Specific quotes from critics is excessive in my opinion, although a general overview would be fine. Boromir123 ( talk) 02:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
It is NOT Tim Tebow's participation in ad that is has drawn controversy, it is HIS mothers's statements without proof that are the controversy! If he was in ad saying abortion is not good, that would be his right, noone ahs right to lie on US airways.
:: especially when it includes critic on ayn randians running wikipedia for their own purposes. Gadfly46 03:08, 5 February 2010 (UTC) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
GADFLY46 (
talk •
contribs)
I normally ignore name-calling and the like, but I'm sorry, somebody calling me an "ayn randian" is about the most hilariously ironic thing I've ever read. Seriously, you have no idea. lol lol lol, etc.
Ahem. Anyway, besides violating the same policies quoted and linked nauseum above, the latest edits put WAY
too much emphasis (there's another linked wikipolicy) on the Super Bowl ad, making the section about as long as sections about record-shattering football seasons. This is an article about a guy who's in a commercial, NOT about the commercial itself. There's no reason for putting in arguments about CBS's advertising policies and history or the intricacies and history of Philippino reproductive law in a biography of a 23 year-old football player.
Among all the issues with these edits, the main problem is that a few editors seem to be
inappropriately trying to slant the article for political reasons. Feel free to hold picket signs, write columns or letters (salon.com is good for that), call CBS and/or your congressperson, or rant all you want in your own blog to get your point across. But wikipedia is NOT the forum for advocacy or activism, especially in a
biography of a living person, which are even more tightly regulated than other articles. Please understand the guidelines before continuing. Thanks.
Zeng8r (
talk) 12:39, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
What is the relevance of including this as a separate section? Should each biographic wiki page include every sort of controversial activity the person engaged in throughout their life? If the section is to remain it must include an accurate description of the controversy. It is not simply a "pro-life ad". It is clearly a major controversy throughout the nation, not restricted to feminist organizations. To uphold the integrity of the page and the website in general all available information about the controversy must be included. It is unfair and blatantly wrong to include a few sentences about this major controversy. Either include a detailed, comprehensive description of the controversy or remove the section entirely. Furthermore, the "protecting" of this page by those with vested interests in the subject is inappropriate at best and unethical at worst. If wikipedia is to have legitimacy in the eyes of society at large, accuracy, transparency, and honesty must be upheld. -- Calboarder24 ( talk) 03:36, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
Here is a NEWS ITEM regarding Tebow in a NEWSPAPER http://www.gazette.com/articles/tebow-93671-bowl-well.html and the REPORTER (unlike the wiki gestapo ) puts in facts . gadfly46 18:22, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
gadfly46 02:14, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
In the end, the commercial itself isn't controversial at all: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=je0lYPUvTZc. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:45, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Can we remove the pro-life activist category? He appeared in one commerical, that hardly makes him an activist. Inclusion into such categories should involve long involvment with a political movement, not one instance of a person declaring their belief. If he continues to comment on abortion-related topics or becomes activly (and visibly) involved with the movement, he can be added. But as it stands right now, he no more belongs in the category, then say, Alanis Morissette belongs in the pro-choice activists category since she has stated she is pro-choice before. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.13.140.153 ( talk) 02:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
I came here as the BBC article about the ad controversy [4] mentions his "trademark biblical references painted underneath his eyes". There's nothing about them in the Wiki article. Can anyone expand? What is the ref? Why does he do it? How long has he been doing it for? Thanks 86.159.39.99 ( talk) 18:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
So I changed the name of the external link of the ad from "Tebow Pro-Life Ad" to "Tebow Super Bowl XLIV Ad." Grundle2600 ( talk) 03:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Ea Sports have named Tim Tebow the cover athlete for Ncaa Football 11 on April 7, 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.98.191.74 ( talk) 18:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
The source provided for the statement regarding the circumstances of Tebow's birth makes no mention of those circumstances. This source reference should be removed and replaced with "reference needed". See specifically the text of source [1]. There is no information regarding Pam Tebow's health at the time of Tim Tebow's birth or any mention of a physician advising her to abort the preganancy.
98.198.236.51 ( talk) 23:42, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
A number of journalists have already started using the nickname. It's catching on, I see no reason why it should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NKS22 ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
I notice there's a bit of an argument (via reverts) over Tebow's jersey number in the Broncos - #15 or #10? I did a Google News search and couldn't find anything definitive, so I am blanking that infobox field for now. If someone has a good source, let me know. Thanks, WordyGirl90 21:58, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/media/ALeqM5j7ej23gb1BIgbpcSq95L_1krWzpg?size=l(him in broncos mini camp,broncos uniform) DaredeviLogan84 ( talk) 16:46, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
For the heisman trophy section; you should change underclassmen to sophmore. There have been nearly a dozen juniors to win the award.
66.66.77.5 ( talk) 03:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Tim Tebow is no longer the incumbent Best Male College Athlete ESPY Award Winner. John Wall is.
claytnb ( talk) 14:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Done PrincessofLlyr royal court 14:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Why isn't there a mention if his statement to the effect that he is a virgin? I think it is notable and has several verifiable reliable sources. Lawyer2b ( talk) 12:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |