Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I do believe we have a solid, interesting, encyclopedic-quality article on Thumbelina. I was surprised to see how enduring a character she has become and as such, there's actually a fair bit of room for expansion. But the basics have been covered, and then some. Kudos for the good work of all who contributed. It was fun to review.--
Scott Free (
talk)
19:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I intend to incorporate this into the article soon. -- Edge3 ( talk) 02:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Great - it can only make it gooder - thanks for help with the film refs. -- Scott Free ( talk) 18:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
GA review – see
WP:WIAGA for criteria
I do believe we have a solid, interesting, encyclopedic-quality article on Thumbelina. I was surprised to see how enduring a character she has become and as such, there's actually a fair bit of room for expansion. But the basics have been covered, and then some. Kudos for the good work of all who contributed. It was fun to review.--
Scott Free (
talk)
19:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I intend to incorporate this into the article soon. -- Edge3 ( talk) 02:35, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Great - it can only make it gooder - thanks for help with the film refs. -- Scott Free ( talk) 18:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)