A news item involving Thubten Zopa Rinpoche was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 April 2023. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just to let you guys know...I'm moving "Thubten Zopa Rinpoche" to "Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche," just to make it easier and more understandable in order to clarify position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prowikipedians ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
I still don't understand. Why? Moving this page is to pay respect to the person. Otherwise, you are regarding this person as an "ordinary monk." He has to be highly respected. Is there another alternative? Prowikipedians ( talk) 07:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I think the editors should reconsider changing this entry to "Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche." Lama Zopa most frequently goes by that name. If we were going to be super honorific we would be pushing "Kyabje Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche." Check the searches for Lama Zopa in the wikipedia logs (vs. Thubten Zopa) and see how frequently people are re-directed from their search for Lama Zopa to the page that lists all the Rinpoches. Lama Zopa really does go by the name Lama Zopa, hence that is what his web page is called. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lurlie ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I've rechecked and rethought about the issue of moving this article to 'Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche'.
Prowikipedians ( talk) 06:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Noting the warning of potential immediate deletion of uncited material I have added citations in the three places where they were missing. Please will the supervisor now consider removing the warning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freewasp ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
A news item involving Thubten Zopa Rinpoche was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 April 2023. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Just to let you guys know...I'm moving "Thubten Zopa Rinpoche" to "Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche," just to make it easier and more understandable in order to clarify position. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prowikipedians ( talk • contribs) 11:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
I still don't understand. Why? Moving this page is to pay respect to the person. Otherwise, you are regarding this person as an "ordinary monk." He has to be highly respected. Is there another alternative? Prowikipedians ( talk) 07:48, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
I think the editors should reconsider changing this entry to "Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche." Lama Zopa most frequently goes by that name. If we were going to be super honorific we would be pushing "Kyabje Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche." Check the searches for Lama Zopa in the wikipedia logs (vs. Thubten Zopa) and see how frequently people are re-directed from their search for Lama Zopa to the page that lists all the Rinpoches. Lama Zopa really does go by the name Lama Zopa, hence that is what his web page is called. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lurlie ( talk • contribs) 22:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello. I've rechecked and rethought about the issue of moving this article to 'Lama Thubten Zopa Rinpoche'.
Prowikipedians ( talk) 06:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Noting the warning of potential immediate deletion of uncited material I have added citations in the three places where they were missing. Please will the supervisor now consider removing the warning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Freewasp ( talk • contribs) 19:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)